Public vote is OK by me!
Spark, it's true that some moron could steal a design. BUT, the theft would be obvious because everyone would know when the date-stamped copyrighted pics hit the net!
As one example I was trying not to allude to directly, when Allen posted pics of a finished product that was too close to another well-known design, we called him on it. To his credit, he made changes and there's no more problem...I'm not trying to drag that back up.
What I am saying is, we KNOW we can fix a "cloning issue" using just "pressure on the cloner's rep". And with that recent episode and it's conclusion, nobody is liable to try it again for a while
!
So, assume we judge by public vote. We need to line up a maker, and we need to figure out how many contestants. The number of contestants will have an impact on the entry fees.
Say we've got a pool of $200 for the total bill in materials and labor, not including sheath. Winner deals with sheathing on their own or something. Then let's assume a guy wins with a little 4" skinner or something. Since that will cost less than some 9" monster, the winner could have the piece done up in "fancier" format, possibly including the cost of Talonite metal. A guy wins with a 9" major fighter, he'll have to settle for 1095 or something to keep the price down, or pay in some extra to cover costs.
Makes sense? Or maybe the guy with the skinner has it done up as a $150 knife or whatever and has the maker do a sheath.
It can all be worked out. Let's try and keep the discussion in this thread; I see there's a second, I'm going to post to it with the URL for this thread saying "go here".
Spark, do you still have concerns and if so, could you lay them out in more detail?
To all: IF YOU THINK YOU'RE LIABLE TO ENTER, post here so we get an idea how popular this could get!
Jim