Blade Magazine "Best Buys" article

ARtsig1

Banned
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
3,692
Anyone else read this article? Was pleased to see that the three makers whose work I am collecting were mentioned as best buys and best bang for the buck in tactical folders and utility folders. Those three being none other than;
-John W. Smith
-Kit Carson
-Mike Obenauf

I agree wholeheartadly with what the author said about JW Smith knives. You only have to hold one to see the fantastic fit and finish involved in the making of it.

Kit Carson is the master of the tactical knife. The model 4 as I stated in an earlier post is the epitomy of the "Tactical folder". What more can be said!

Mike Obenauf is undoubtadbly one of the rising stars in the knife world. His fit and finish already rival some makers who have ben building many more years than he. Of course it don't hurt to have Kit Carson as your mentor!

What say the rest of you. Anyone else recognize a favorite maker from this article? Anyone that wasn't in the article that should have been?

Lets hear it.
 
Hi Art,

I do agree with you that it is an excellent article and should be read.

Mike Haskew is an excellent writer who does a great job "capturing" the thoughts of these custom knife dealers he interviews for this article. Then putting them into a concentrated format that is easily digestable. That is no easy task. I know that one of the dealers in this article can be especially "windy" when it comes to talking about custom knives! ;)

Mike is currently working on an article for new makers and makes who may have not received the "exposure" they should have, to watch in 2003. I suspect his article will be right on the money.
I can't wait to read this one, so I know which knife makers to buy from next year! :D

I really enjoyed the article, especially some of the quotes in the big print! :D
 
;) ;) ;) :D I thought it was so good and I liked it so much I went ahead and purchased another J.W. Smith!:eek: :D I picked up a LS-1 "Eighties" in large format with a 4" blade of S30V steel. Of the four JW Smith's I already have 3 are recurves so I needed to even it out a bit with a straight edged version.

Les, I always enjoy reading what you have to say and no, your not windy, just opinionated, which it doesn't hurt to be. Especially if your opinion is right and you know it!:) I have become opinionated about J.W. Smith, Kit Carson, and Mike Obenauf, and I'm right about them and I know it!:eek: ;) I don't think you would be able to stay in this buisness nor grow your buisness to the extent it is without being of a certain opinion.

Any future plans for a collab with Mike Obenauf? If so put me down for one!:D
 
I am fortunate enough to own knives by several of the makers mentioned in the blade article. One who has not been mentioned yet is P.J. Tomes. He is my favorite traditional knife maker, especially when it comes to bang for the buck (Bailey Bradshaw is great too but his knives are more costly and ornate.) I own several Tomes knives. One of all time favorite knives is the stag handled double lockback moose that P.J. made for me last Spring. That knife is marvel to behold since it has locking blades that work on only one backspring.

I also have to second Artsig in his general praise of Kit Carson, Mike Obenauf, and J.W. Smith.
 
Hi Les,
I read this article many times, and my wife asked me : what are you looking at?" I told her :I am looking at which knives I should not miss it!
I agree with what you said!
And another personal question :Will you get more J.W.Smith's knives? :D
 
I saw Bill Ruple's name in the best buy list too. He makes some great traditional slip joints and has quite a few patterns to pick from too.

Regards
 
I'm sorry to say that the omission of Tom Mayo from that list is criminally negligent!!:grumpy:
 
Ryan,

Criminal negligance......I think not.

The only thing the professionals interviewed for this article are guily of . Is having the balls to allow their opinion's to be put in print. Knowing full well that these "opinion's" will irritate some collectors and makers alike. For no other reason that they didn't list a particular makers name.

Here are a few other names that weren't in the article, perhaps you have heard of some of these makers.

Makers such as:

Walter Brend
David Broadwell
Larry Chew
Alan Elishewitz
Ernie Emerson
Ron Lake
Bob Loveless
Schyler Lovestrand
Bob Lum
Bill Moran
Cliff Parker
Jim Siska
Butch Vallotton

The list can go on and on.

This probably has not occured to you. That the different dealers were asked specific questions, with specific parameters.

Yes, there are reasons these individuals were specifically interviewed for this article. Guys these are just the opinions of those interviewed. You can agree or disagree that is your right.

Ryan, instead of claiming criminal negligance. Perhaps you should look at those makers listed and examine why they were chosen and others weren't.

That is where the true lesson of this article is found.
 
Originally posted by Les Robertson
Ryan,

Criminal negligance......I think not...Ryan, instead of claiming criminal negligance. Perhaps you should look at those makers listed and examine why they were chosen and others weren't.

That is where the true lesson of this article is found.

That was a joke, son, a joke. I doubt that the man was actually considering legal action. :rolleyes:
 
actually, the other "lesson" is that the majority of the makers listed are ones that sell a lot of knives via dealers...especially on the lower end of the price scale of the featured makers. some of the others are regular blade advertisers

it should not shock anyone that dealers would recommend those knives they have a regular opportunity to resell...or that blade supports its advertisers. that's business folks...nothing criminal or evil about it.

before you draw your own conclusions though....make sure you look at the sources for such "learned articles" and what their motivations are...a wise thing for any field of study

the inclusion of a maker in such an article is still nice publicity for them though. most of them have good reputations and deserve it.

there are some really odd choices if the criteria is truly "best bang for the buck" ...

on the other end the exclusion of a maker does not mean much either and should not be cause to rile up the masses... this article was more of the "popularity" contest variety among those who depend on selling knives for a living ...then any sort of objective analysis.

keep in mind there are many fine makers who will never be listed in such polls due to their unwillingness to give dealers deep discounts, various and sundry personality conflicts, or they might just be #11 in a poll of 10....
 
Bandaidman,

I know you mean well and are just offering another opinion. However, it is probably in the best interest of this forum that you try and get your facts straight before you make generalizations.

First,Deep discounts???? Many of the makers listed in this article give NO Discount.

Your Quote: "this article was more of the "popularity" contest variety among those who depend on selling knives for a living ...then any sort of objective analysis."

Popularity Contest? Exactly what is it that makes a knife maker popular. No the answer is not "demand". Although that is part of the equation.

Is it a popularity contest if the dealers are buying from a maker before you or just about any other collector ever heard of the maker?

Take John W. Smith, mentioned by every dealer in this article. I met John at the very first knife show he ever set up at. It was a horrible show 18 customers through the door.

I knew Jerry Fisk when he was Journeyman Smith. I've known Kit Carson for 15 years. Were they popular then? No.

How about Joel Chamblin, I met him over 10 years ago at a little gun show here in Augusta. It was the first show he had ever been to. Was he popular then? No.

Did you know that I bought the first knife that Kouji Hara ever sold in the US? No, you probably didn't know that. Was he popular then? No.

Point to all this? The dealers in this article were buying knives from the majority of the makers listed in this article, before most collectors even knew who they were.

Yes, the business aspect continues. Did you consider this? Some of those makers that were not listed are now annoyed with the dealers who didn't mention their names.

"Blade supports it's advertisers". I don't advertise in Blade. Many of the makers listed in this article do not advertise in Blade. To their credit Blade is interested in all makers, not just the ones who advertise with them. Actually, most knife magazines are that way.

You were right on with this quote:

" before you draw your own conclusions though....make sure you look at the sources for such "learned articles" and what their motivations are...a wise thing for any field of study"

That is exactly what Blade did, they sought out "Expert" advise. Each of the dealers interviewed for this article had at least 10 years experience and each has sold million's of dollars of custom knives.

Bandaid, who would you have had Blade interview for this article? Do you think collectors would have less bias? Before you answer this, keep Mr. "Criminal Negligance" in mind.

No matter who would have been included in this article, or who was not. There are going to be hurt feelings.

Boys and girls, facts are facts. Most of the makers listed in this article are among some of the most sought after in the world. They have gotten to this point not through luck or some mistake or accident. They have gotten their through hard work and countless hours learing their craft. For many working with dealers over a several years has not hurt their popularity either.

Yes, many are popular. However, if their knives were of poor quality and overpriced. Do you think they would be in the position they are today? No.

Lets not forget the concept of the article.
 
Mr. Robertson,
My comment was satire. I think that perhaps you took it as serious. Sorry for the misunderstanding. As to the other makers you mentioned, I'm not really sure who they are. Are they in the industry?;)
 
No Les, my facts are quite straight

Let me begin by saying you are a reputable dealer who has implemented and carried out a successful business plan. You know knives and have the ability to view them as a commodity.... important if you wish to make a living doing it.

Enthusiasts and hard-core collectors often have difficulty becoming successful dealers because they cannot separate their "collecting side… want to keep" from the "business side… need to sell".

You and I of course disagree on the economic wisdom on investing in collectibles... but that has been covered before and is a subject for another thread.

Let us begin with discounts ... you do take them ... there is nothing wrong with that.... it is how you make a living unless you charge higher then maker rates or buy secondary pieces at a discount.

Les, you have a reputation for offering less for knives then many other dealers ... this is directly from makers I have communicated with.

There is nothing wrong or sinful with that. You simply won't do business with people who think you pay too little (i.e. deeper than normal discounts). Both sides have to be happy to make a deal. You put more into marketing then many dealers and you should be compensated for that. Depending on the particular maker it may or may not be worth your "cut" to do business with you.

You are a salesman at heart ... you push those makers you represent and you do it well but you are generally sparse with praise for makers you don’t represent who compete in the same class as the makers you do.

You are knowledgeable but you also are clearly biased towards those makers who help you make a living. This limits the usefulness of your information.

As far as the other dealers I know one sold his business and one other is more of a gents/ art knives dealer. The other two I have had no dealings with. I cannot adequately speak towards the value of their opinions.

Dealers represent a good source for information but should not be the sole reference. Knowledgeable makers and collectors also have useful knowledge to form a more balanced picture.

I am under no illusions that such articles can be truly objective… these kinds of pieces ask a subjective question and thus must arrive at a subjective answer. Just how useful the subjective conclusions are depends on the quality of the “input”. In this case I think the input reflects a particular bias and the results reflect it…. That is why I state this article is a popularity contest… popularity with dealers being the key.

I will now cease writing on what seems to be the longest post I have ever written… sorry if I did not address all your points
 
Although articles in knife magzines might be somewhat baised it by no means makes them inaccurate. Of course the knife magazines Favor advertisers but they don't exclude non advertisers. It wouldn't make good businesssense to do so.
It certainly makes good business sense for the dealer to mention the makers whose work he carries. I'm also glad that he does.
Who knows more about that specific knife and maker than he does?
I feel he's giving more accurate information on the knives he sells than knives he's only had a chance to handle a couple times.
At one time I was a very outspoken critic of dealers using the "informational" approach to selling their knives. I didn't need the Les Robertsons of the business to tell me what a good knife was but I always seemed to spend time goin over the knives on their tables.
Sure I did, that's where the knives were. I eventually realized it made a lot more sense for me to slow down and listen to the advice given and add it to the tools I use in making my own evaluations.
Closing my mind the what they were saying just took away another valuable source of ACCURATE information.
 
Bandaidman,

Because I am involved in this on a daily basis. I know all the "players". I know what their positions are in the market. I know which makers are on the way up, which ones are on their way down and which ones have hit a plateau. I have access to information that you and most other collectors do not. This is the case of most dealers. This is part of my job.

Consequently, who I buy from is not based on a single criteria. It is based on 9 different criteria.

My main criteria is quality for the money. It has been for 18 years. This started with me back when I was only going to buy 1 using custom knife.

Truth be told most of my purchase decisions are based that way.

This "philosophy" has carried over into my business. If it were meerly about the money or if I was meerly a salesman. Don't you think I would work with more makers?

In your most recent post you side stepped my question regarding the popularity contest. If I was buying knives (and still continue to do so) from makers who no one ever heard of when I bought their knives. It wasn't a popularity contest, it was value for the money.

Yes, it is true that you can make some quick money if you can get knives from a maker who is popular at the moment.

If you would check with makers I work with (not those I don't, after all, much like you they do not know the inner workings of my business), you would find that I am always thinking long term, not short term.

If it was truly all about money, I would have SALES on my site or have a BARGAIN BASEMENT on my site.

If it was truly all about money, I would list makers wholesale prices as their retail price...so I could get my money back out of a knife.

Yes, these have and do exist with other dealers out there.

Bandaid, I do have a problem with one of your statements:

Quote:

" Les, you have a reputation for offering less for knives then many other dealers ... this is directly from makers I have communicated with."

This is a lie. The person or persons who told you this are liars.

You give me their names and I will confront them with this information. I will use your name as a reference. I guarantee there will be some type of "qualifier" given. Qualifier is a nice way of saying, they will try and tap dance out of the lie.

You will probably be amazed at just how quickly you will find these makers tell me that you miss-interpreted what they said.

Without naming names what is this "deep discount" I demand. What do you think is a deep discount.

Now remember, just about everything you buy has at least a 50% discount given to dealers. Refgirators, furniture, clothing, etc. Even factory knives (some dealers get almost 60%).

That being said, what do you think a deep discount on custom knives would be?

Next Quote:

Here is your next quote:

"There is nothing wrong or sinful with that. You simply won't do business with people who think you pay too little (i.e. deeper than normal discounts)."

So your saying that I won't do business with any maker who doesn't give me a deeper than normal discount? Just want to clairfy this. A yes or no answer will be fine.

Another of your qoutes:

"Let us begin with discounts ... you do take them ... there is nothing wrong with that.... it is how you make a living unless you charge higher then maker rates or buy secondary pieces at a discount."

Bandaid, yes I do take discounts from makers. This is how on over 95% of the knives I offer, are sold at the makers price. While this is becoming more common today, 8 years ago when I implimented this policy, few if any dealers did this.

You will also notice at shows, I don't "haggle" with customers over the price of the knife.

Today, dealers charging the makers price and not haggling over price are becoming more common place.

As for purchase's in the aftermarket, my rule of thumb is that I pay what I would pay the maker...if the knife is in mint condition.

Bandaid,

Here is your chance to expose the seedy underbelly of dealer maker relationships.

All you have to do is answer a few questions and name some names. What could be simpler!

Bandiad, I too hear makers bitch about dealers and their wanting discounts.

A couple of pieces of food for thought.

First, many of those makers who bitch the loudest about dealers, are the very ones who's knives a particular dealer doesn't carry.

Second, discounts are not meerly "free money" given to the dealer. It is for their ability to increase the makers position in a particular market. Quite frankly, the insight and information I provide on the custom knife marekt. To the makers I work with, is worth every penny of the discount they give me.

The relationship I have with the makers I work with is designed to benefit both of us. Ultimately, this will benefit the collector as well. Example, my Vanguard series.

Third, lets not forget that the makers have to have cash flow as well. After all there is a reason they offer a discount to dealers!

Lastly, I have never, ever seen a dealer hold a gun to a makers head to get a discount...NEVER.
 
As a maker who has worked with Les in the past, and will continue to do so in the future, I have had nothing but fair and honest dealings with Les. With my limited time resources, Les has never had a problem taking what I send him, when I can send it. Hell, I can't even keep a knife on his site long enough to get some exposure:D
 
Originally posted by bandaidman
actually, the other "lesson" is that the majority of the makers listed are ones that sell a lot of knives via dealers...especially on the lower end of the price scale of the featured makers. some of the others are regular blade advertisers

it should not shock anyone that dealers would recommend those knives they have a regular opportunity to resell...

I don't know much about the business side of the custom knife world, but this strikes me as a strange way to look at a business. A trader always buys cheap to sell high - this is how a trader makes a living. Given that, if you ask a trader what items are good bang-for-buck, you're asking them a question which is by definition how they go about selecting their offering. So it shouldn't be surprising to see a big overlap. Just my $0.02.

JD
 
Back
Top