Blade size for chopping???

What is the minimal size blade that is reasonable for chopping? Will a 5" work? 6"? Is the starting point 7"?
.
For a knife to be a clear "chopper" I would suggest that around 8" is where you start.
I own a 7" blade and whild it's a good knife, it's not as good at chopping in one swing as a good 8" knife.
Any smaller and you just dont have the power.
Another thing thats also important is that the blade have the right thickness and weight that helps you chop stuff.

Any blades down there as small as 5" or 6" inches and you cant really call them a "chopper knife".
and once you get over 15" long then you may be calling it by another name becides "knife"
 
I would say 10" is the minumum for an effective chopper, but I prefer blades 12" upwards and my favourite at the momment is a 14" blade khukuri which weighs 26oz.

Old tree stump poorly cut, but luckily the rest of the trunk was available for a play.
bushyday010.jpg

bushyday011.jpg

bushyday015.jpg

bushyday014.jpg
 
And I recall posts about others that prefered 4 inchers to bigger blades.

all they were talking about were either an axe, with a 4" face and 19" handle. Or they could have been talking about some cleaver style knife, japanese style.
 
Judging from the cuts that looked a bit of a struggle, what size knife was that, and the weight?
 
I think my best chopper by FAR is about a 4" blade.




It weighs about a pound and a half, and the handle is 19" long.
And I recall posts about others that prefered 4 inchers to bigger blades.

That was meant to be a joke bro !!!:p
 
I think my best chopper by FAR is about a 4" blade.

It weighs about a pound and a half, and the handle is 19" long.

That was meant to be a joke bro !!!:p

Ok, maybe not "chopping", but I remember that some guys told the bigger blades they carry in the woods was a 4 incher. Maybe their technique is closer to batoning than chopping.
 
Its a Busse of some kind and I can assure you it wasn't much of a struggle.

Skam

He he, yes, it's a Fusion Battle Mistress (FBM) with magnum scales by the looks of it.

If you look closely, you can see the tree weeping...
 
yeah its a FBM with mag handles, it wasn't a struggle but i am going to have the edge thinned out just a little bit to improve chopping performance. Yoshi i'm not sure what the weight is but the blade is around 9 inches i think. it has some heft to it. i have another Busse chopper that is lighter i'll post some pics of it later tonight
 
Weight of the FBM with mags is about 27oz. Blade is 10" long, 2" high, 1/4" thick, overall is 16" long.

It's one hell of a chopper.
 
Mmmh, depends on what is to be chopped. On stationary targets (anything that doesn't move or bend out of the way) an axe or hatchet will easily outperform even a big knife. I have directly compared a wetterlings hatchet against an RD9 which are amost the same length and weight and on stationary targets the RD9 doesn't stand a chance, that is with an edge thinned to 15 deg. (just under 20 deg on the Wetterlings). The Wetterlings hatchet will take down any of the pictured trees in shorter time but far more importantly with much few strokes. If you were to take the Wetterlings Hunters axe, the difference would be so large that a comparison wouldn't make much sense anymore. The Wetterlings will run you between $20 and $30 compared to about $120 for most of the large knives and $400+ for the large Busses. And after chopping a few trees they will also continue to shave easily. However, the fit and finish (or lack thereof) of the Wetterlings will require that you even out the grind on a coarse stone and sharpen them up properly.

However, on everthing that is not stationary, in particular branches up to 1" of very hard wood and 2" of soft wood (pine) a big knife will out perform any axe. The tip speed is much higher and you can clear a branch with one swipe. Of course you can often put the branch onto chopping block and use an axe but a knife can clear the branch "free standing" which is usually much more efficient. But for that the knife needs to be of decent length. I would agree on 9" minimum. Of course in a pinch even a 7" knife can chop but very quickly batoning becomes far more efficient.

As a rule of thumb I would say, on everything that needs only one or two fast swipes the knife wins, on anything bigger the axe wins with each additional stroke you have to take the axe becoming more and more favored. On a 2x4 (not exactly wilderness survival :) but a good example) a knife might seemingly even outperform an axe, because you can take more strokes with a knife than with an axe in the same time, and you might chop through a 2x4 quicker with a knife even though you will need fewer strokes with the axe. However, on ten 2x4s fatigue will set in and the axe will first pass the knife and eventually pull far ahead.

Just my $0.02 as usual.

P.S.:Why do you guys make such rediculusly small v-notches when chopping? Very inefficient!
 
Mmmh, depends on what is to be chopped. On stationary targets (anything that doesn't move or bend out of the way) an axe or hatchet will easily outperform even a big knife. !

Probably so but many other pro hatchet types also miss the point entirely.

With one tool you can chop what you need to and low and behold you also have a usefull knife after to do a million other chores, all in one tool. Not so with a hatchet.
It is a trade off granted but I fail to see the need to add more tools, bulk and weight to my pack 10 miles into the bush.

Car camping who cares bring a chain saw.

Skam
 
Back
Top