For me it is all about geometry, (it is for most others as well, whether they know it or not). Messing with the actual blades and their qualities only tends to be a distraction when determining the quality of heat treat and the internal condition of the steel, and by the time you have it sharpened it is a little too late to worry about those things anyhow, except for the next one you make. Each blade is Rockwell tested until I have walked it in to the desired hardness for the application. Control samples are measured for impact strength and the fractured ends are examined for grain condition and characteristics of fracture before mounting, grinding and polishing for microscopic examination.
Now that I know what my forging and heat treatments have done inside and out, all that is left is to determine what the final shaping and polishing has done for the performance. Occasionally I chop seasoned barn beams to see how the edge geometry works and how a new handle configuration feels. Most people are so focused on the blade that they never pay attention to how that handle is going to feel after long use, or how it will affect the cut. I have found that clearing a fence row of saplings and brush is great for this on larger knives. For smaller blades loan them to friends to dress out a deer (hog, cow, bear, rhino, etc... any larger game) and watch how they use them and how they stand up to that use (not everybody handles a knife exactly like you).
Folks don't like to hear it but many of the most common "tests" have little use in my shop as they tell me little or nothing about what I want to know. I honestly don't care how much an edge flexed over a brass rod as this only suggests something about the heat treatment when it is too late and then says very little compared to what it indicates about the edge thickness, and I already know how thick the edge is since I ground the dang thing. I am more interested in other strengths so for years at many of my demos I have shown my brass rod test, which consists of impacting the edge on various angles with a 1/2" brass rod, taking good bites of the softer metal and looking close for any damage to the edge.
Cutting various materials by hand can be so subjective that it is almost useless as a standardized test for me. Hair shaving is a minimal standard as it really doesn't take much and if I can't at least do this I am not bothering with other tests. Depending on how you sharpen it you can have a blade that will shave like crazy (a fine polished wedge) but not cut other things well (which need some toothiness) or vice versa. I find cutting cigarette paper to be a pretty good standard of sharpness that is better than shaving, there are ranges of efficiency in shaving with everybody seeing it differently (I have seen some who were happy pulling more hair out than actually cutting it), with cigarette paper it either cuts or it don't.
Sometimes I will put the edge under the microscope to see what its condition and configuration is and how the steel took that edge, and reexamine it later to see the exact mechanisms of edge wear. I don't bother with it much anymore, but a very good test for folks heat treating in a forge or other open flames is to drop the blade point first from five or six feet into concrete or steel plate, if there is any damage to the tip, you are overheating it. Due to the specialized and subjective nature of it, I don't bother with any of the popular modes of rope cutting.