This one wasn't so hard for me to decide. Clearly these all deserve to be in the finals. Regardless of which one wins there will be legitimate reasons for it. Ultimately it comes down to personal taste and the voter's conception of what a hunter is to them. This is how I broke it down in my head.
B. Seward - I love this knife. It's beautiful to look at and the design, combination of materials and the workmanship is outstanding. Great sheath too. But I see it more of an EDC or fighter. I have no doubt that it would make a great hunter as well but I don't get a hunter vibe from it.
J. Rodebaugh - Beautifully made knife and handsome sheath. But the aesthetics of the piece don't work for me.
S. Fowler - I really like this knife and it looks like a very handy hunting knife. For me, it just came down to the pinched area where the guard spacer meets the stag handle. That killed it for me.
J. Doyle - I love John's work but the patina treatment on the blade isn't my favorite. I also prefer a guard on this style of knife..
K. Andersen - I have a lot of respect for Karl's work. His knives are well built and designed for the work they'll do. Some of the details of this piece don't speak to me.
#3 John Doyle - This one does it for me so it gets my vote. John is a guy who sweats the details. The lines on his knives are well considered and executed. The dimensions, flow, proportion, surface finish and accent materials are artfully chosen and assembled. The overall design and tonal palette of this piece is cohesive. Each detail serves the whole without being overdone.