They're both pretty good knives, but having handled all of them, I just don't think they're competitors at their respective price points. You have to pass up so many amazing Kershaws, Spydercos and Benchmades to get there. People claim that the fit and finish is terrific, and they're right. But on the plain Sebenzas and any of the Aliases, you're not really doing anything that complex to require amazing quality.
Which Ti framelock would I get given the money? Well, I DO have the money, and I have handled all of them, and I bought a Blue Bump. I don't like AO, but the rest of the knife is so impressive I didn't care. If it weren't a Ti Bump, it'd be mini-skirmish.
Now THAT'S complex. Now THAT requires precision.
Then there's that argument: "but AM, how can you sure the quality will be as good on your particular model? CRK and Bradley deliver consistent perfection."
Who cares? If you've got 400 dollars burning a hole in your pocket and you're worried about getting a minor imperfection on your Blue Bump, or whatever you choose, just buy two of them. You'll STILL save money.
Not that any of this matters. The place you order it from will replace it for you anyway, and even if they weren't going to, Kershaw/Benchmade etc would fix it, but before any of this, if you took the extra 2 minutes to call up your dealer and ask them to give it a good lookover it'll be irrelevant.
I may buy a Sebenza one day. They're well made and innovative knives, deserving of a lot of credit, especially in a historical sense. But if I do buy one, it'll probably be for novelty. The innovations of CRK have been replicated and improved upon elsewhere for less money, and a 3% increase in quality doesn't merit a 150% increase in price.