- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Messages
- 15,417
Yeah - as I was thinking it through I could see several reasons why companies publishing stuff like that might not be a good thing. There'd be a bunch more 16oz. "pocketknives" on the market for instance...
Still can't help enjoying watching destruction/abuse tests. I will never be convinced that many of those tests, when done as consistently/scientifically as possible, do give a lot of valuable information - at least for knives calling themselves "hard-use".
Edit: or "combat" or "survival", etc. These knives should hold up under stress and sadly many don't.
I think it creates an unrealistic vision of what a knife can do. "My lock can hold XXXX lbs and still works" Great, hows it slice tomatoes? Does it pull 3' cross grain cardboard rips? How well does it spread jam on my bagel?
Like I said, I really like tearing stuff up, and I like knowing that my knife can handle itself in a jam, but if you have to put more than a couple dozen lbs of pressure on your blade, then you are doing it wrong.
If you are in a tough spot, and you need your knife to do some "non knife stuff", its nice to know it can take it.
I batoned my 303 through a pine 2x4 with a ton of knots, with me heading right at them or through them.
I don't think I even caused a rubbed spot on the DLC coating. Still locks up like a tank tread, and I have no doubt that it will serve me well.
And to think, the 561 I got, has pretty much the same lock. And some really cool ball bearings.
Moose