the BSA (and canadian scouts) has gone the way of the dodo. Its function now is little more than pandering to special interest groups with liberal agendas and touchy feely everyones a winner, the outdoors is bad, campfires, axes, knives, guns are all bad heres a crayon draw a nice picture pile of BS.
No.
What BSA needs most is leadership.From within.I think that is what makes or breaks any troop.The older boys are always looked up to by the puppies.If the older scouts are hep it is a good troop.
Yes.
I wrote this four years ago on a similar topic on the Hoodswoods forum, unless things have changed very drastically since then it's still valid, and I couldn't have really said it any better now.
"Posted on: Nov 2 2006
Right now I'm at school about 700 miles from home, I turned in my Eagle scout application the day before I left back in August, and (hopefully) will be able to take my board of review when I'm home for Thanksgiving. I've been in Scouts since I was in 7th grade.
Like a lot have said, the experience you have in Boy scouts Is going to be directly related to the leaders you have. Luckily, my troop had a great set of leaders. The Scoutmaster has been leader of the troop since before I was born, served in the Navy in Vietnam, very active, and loves the outdoors. I joined back in 7th grade because of reading camping and survival books and wanted to get outdoors, something which no one in my family was very interested in. The troop takes weekend camping trips once a month, car camping usually (though organization campgrounds are always more seculded than "modern campgrounds"), though canoeing and backpacking are done at least once a year each, every summer we go to summer camp for one week, and take a one week high adventure. We wore our uniforms (just shirts, patches and neckerchiefs if you had one) usually about twice a year and at summer camp during formations.
Summer camp had us scouts basically on our own, since our SM had to work and wasn't with us all week, we had adults, but the SPL (usually me.. haha) was responsible for a lot. High Adventures were awesome, my first year we biked across Michigan, the next Whitewater rafting, then canoeing and backpacking on Isle Royale, canoeing in quetico, and whitewater rafting in WV again, I loved those trips, and I know there's no way i would've been able to do any of it if it weren't for Scouts.
However, aside from the leaders our troop also had the benefit of never having more than 12 Scouts at any time I can remember, making going on trips a lot more possible. Other troops I ran into it seemed like were not nearly as outdoor oriented, were more 'by-the-book' (therefore, lame) and had adults basically babysitting the scouts. This past summer we were joined up with another troop for our rafting trip, they weren't allowed to have matches or lighters because their leaders wouldn't allow it, and were bascially clueless when it came to camping, we avoided them as much as possible, (so did the river guides).
I guess I'm sort of rambling here, but I'm trying to say a good deal of scout troops suck, but some are very good. I got lucky.
To Cheap:
Likes:
-Camping/canoeing/biking/backpacking/hiking/fire/etc etc..
-Learning/listening to stories from the leaders about past experiences. Always amusing.
-Being SPL, or filling some other leadership role.
Dislikes:
-Eagle project application: I understand it's a lot of work, but no one was able to explain to me quite what was supposed to presented to the district, and when it was finished who the people who needed to approve it were. Though I was told the process was being revamped in my area, which was cause for a lot of confusion.
-Not enough emphasis on outdoor skills, this was especially evident when I saw other troops.
-Uniforms/Uniform cost. The uniform is crappy and expensive, I don't care if it is made in the US, the prices are insane.
I apologize for the rather winding post, but If anyone has any questions feel free to ask.
And if any of you Hoodlums with sons are in the Detroit , MI area, Troop 479 all the way."