Buck 110 Vs. Sog hunter revolver (continuation)

Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
5,010
The testing of A Buck 110, and a continuation of the sog.


So, first, I wanted to see how well the Revolver H would split some wood. Now, I didnt split very big pieces, but it split 1"x4" pieces fine.
p4160086zz5.jpg


I had a little tinder in my poclet kit, so I used that, and some shavings taken
with the Sog to get a fire going.
p4160089mf2.jpg

p4160090dr0.jpg

p4160091hy1.jpg


So, as of now, I know that the sog will saw wood, and split it should I ever
call it to do so.
 
BUCK 110 --------


When I went out, I took out the Ka-Bar to split the wood I was going to then shave with the 110 the get a fire going with it. But, I thought it would be neat to split the 1"X4" with the 110, make some shavings, then get the fire going so I did. :D

Here is the pile of shavings from the 110

p4160093bs9.jpg


Now the split piece of 1"X4"
p4160095pv3.jpg


These pieces were too long, so I choped them down a bit with the 110, then broke over my knee.
p4160096ab6.jpg


Now, ready to get going.
p4160097ft9.jpg


Then going and REALLY going.
p4160098lw3.jpg

p4160100pv2.jpg



So there ya have it, I was impressed by the 110, its lock failed once, and that was when I really came onto it around that knot, but over all these knives would be great on your belt. They both started shaving sharp, and though the buck lost its shaving ability, it was brought back in no time, by just stropping on its sheath. The sog kept its level of sharpness the entire time.
 
i assume you battoned with the lock engaged on the 110...i personally would not want to abuse the lock in such a way, and have heard of battoning with the lock disengaged, to not risk damaging it, though i understand doing it for the sake of testing its limits.

the 110 seems too handle heavy and overall not heavy enough to chop effectively...when i find myself underknifed i like to just notch around the peice going deeper and deeper until i can snap it and saw/whittle at the fibers that hold on (mostly on green wood)

a good comparison overall, and i commend you for having the courage to beat the knives to the point of failure.
 
the 110 seems too handle heavy and overall not heavy enough to chop effectively...when i find myself underknifed i like to just notch around the peice going deeper and deeper until i can snap it and saw/whittle at the fibers that hold on (mostly on green wood)

Oh no, of course not, this was beatin it up to see when it would unlock :D

Though, I have to say, it worked ok for what it did.
Not too shabby. :thumbup:
 
Awesome test.....I love posts like this....both cool knives too.... usually if I atempt to batton with a folder I donot engage the lock I just open it to about 90 degrees, pinch grip the handle and batton the blade (this way it doesn't put pressure on the lock.) I learned this the hard way after busting a puma folder while making a fire. But again that's just me...And I'm certainly not an expert at these things...regardless Fonly keep up the good work..
 
Yeah, like I said, I was pushing this thing. I almost had a want to break it to see if it would, I mean, its like a $30-$40 dollar knife, but man its strong! :thumbup:
 
Buck knives are no joke I had a buck ranger for a long time....It was like a punching bag i took so much abuse... for the $$$$ they are real work horses. What kind of locking mech does the revolver use to keep it stable??? is it sturdy?
 
Buck knives are no joke I had a buck ranger for a long time....It was like a punching bag i took so much abuse... for the $$$$ they are real work horses. What kind of locking mech does the revolver use to keep it stable??? is it sturdy?

its very stable, in reality, it has three pins like anyother fixedblade. Its kinda late tonight, but ill put up a showing of the pins, and how sturdy they are. It is as strong as a fixed blade.
 
I'm impressed by the tests, excellent, I wouldn't normally consider a folder for such work.
 
Great tests again Fonly, I'm suprised that those revolvers aren't more popular than they are.....they are a perfect addition to any BOB !!!
 
... It is as strong as a fixed blade.

No it's not :D Sorry, but I'm just not buying that. However I readily admit that a good folder, used sanely, is plenty strong enough for most people and tasks. I like fixed blades outdoors mainly because they don't fill up with gunk. Other than that, my 110 has never let me down :)

I like your testing methods; as others said, I wouldn't normally baton a locked folder but it's good that you did. It helps one's confidence to know where the "breaking point" is. Looks like you've got two good knives to choose from.
 
No it's not :D Sorry, but I'm just not buying that. However I readily admit that a good folder, used sanely, is plenty strong enough for most people and tasks. I like fixed blades outdoors mainly because they don't fill up with gunk. Other than that, my 110 has never let me down :)

I like your testing methods; as others said, I wouldn't normally baton a locked folder but it's good that you did. It helps one's confidence to know where the "breaking point" is. Looks like you've got two good knives to choose from.

Im serious it is :thumbup:

I was talking to Robbie, and far as he knew, none have been broken yet, I mean its not a large knife by anymeans. It had three Pins that hold it very tight, And I have no problem using it as I would an other fixed blade of that size.

ymmv, thats my opinion though. :rolleyes: :D
 
Fair enough Fonly, I'm not about to argue with ya since you've tested it and I haven't. My belief stems from my rather limited knowledge of steel strength, and I could be completely wrong... I've been told I was wrong before :)

The "argument" is purely academic; obviously you've found that it's plenty strong :thumbup:
 
They are tough knives. I can say they hold their own against any 5 inch blade straight knife I know. But the amazing thing is they contain a saw that can do many things other 5 inch blades can not do.

Now don't get me wrong, I love my "other" straights, but my Revolver has never failed me after 3 years of steady use. I'm sure a person could break one........ just as many other knives have been broken........ pushing to the outer limits of steel etc.

The Revolver series has proven it is a tough knife over and over for over 3 years, I am proud of the record it has.

Below is a link I found talking about the Revolver that many people do not know about the Revolver series..........It's not a super knife, but it sure does what I and thousands of others have ask of it.

Fonly, you are an excellent knife review "illustrator" :eek: , your pics are amazing ! Thank you ! :D

Not sure who the people are who wrote this below, but thanks if you read this.........

http://survival.com/IVB/index.php?showtopic=11345&pid=108400&mode=threaded&start=#entry108400


Robbie Roberson ;)
 
They are tough knives. I can say they hold their own against any 5 inch blade straight knife I know. But the amazing thing is they contain a saw that can do many things other 5 inch blades can not do.

Now don't get me wrong, I love my "other" straights, but my Revolver has never failed me after 3 years of steady use. I'm sure a person could break one........ just as many other knives have been broken........ pushing to the outer limits of steel etc.

The Revolver series has proven it is a tough knife over and over for over 3 years, I am proud of the record it has.

Below is a link I found talking about the Revolver that many people do not know about the Revolver series..........It's not a super knife, but it sure does what I and thousands of others have ask of it.

Fonly, you are an excellent knife review "illustrator" :eek: , your pics are amazing ! Thank you ! :D

Not sure who the people are who wrote this below, but thanks if you read this.........

http://survival.com/IVB/index.php?showtopic=11345&pid=108400&mode=threaded&start=#entry108400


Robbie Roberson ;)

Thanks muchly Robbie, Its a joy to do, even funner with a good knife ;)
 
Fair enough Fonly, I'm not about to argue with ya since you've tested it and I haven't. My belief stems from my rather limited knowledge of steel strength, and I could be completely wrong... I've been told I was wrong before :)

The "argument" is purely academic; obviously you've found that it's plenty strong :thumbup:

I know what you mean, I was a little unsure about it as well, and by no means am I an expert.

I just want to make sure and hope I didnt sound to assish, as I can sometimes. :D

No disrespect meant Gibson :thumbup:
 
Fonley.....

Great test. I tend to go with Gibsonfan on this. A folder by design isn't as strong as a fixed blade. I have never "tested" the two other than what I have done/used camping, or hunting. By design a folder has a week spot under extreme stress..... the lock. None the less, I have used a Buck 110, and 112 and for the most part agree with you. Buck makes a GREAT lockback. 420 steel and all.;) :D

Nice post:thumbup:
 
Looks to me like we're all on the same page! I don't see any "assishness" in this thread, just good fair evaluations.

Testing your gear is good clean dirty fun :D as well as being a sound idea. Keep the reviews coming, Fonly, you write clearly and well and take good pics, too.
 
As soon as I can get one, I want to try a SOG Tigershark against a Ka-Bar 8" Tanto, and a Becker BK7.

Thats gonna be the one with shelter, fire and well see what else comes into play ;) :D
 
Back
Top