Cobalt
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 1998
- Messages
- 17,721
sodak said:I don't have a FSH, but do have a Steelheart E, as well as a couple of Fehrmans.
Once you hold them, they are quite different. I wouldn't think of the Fehrman as a knock off or copy at all. It has a much thinner point, and a thinner primary grind. I have found the 3V to have better edge holding than INFI. Not that INFI is bad... So far, they both take impact resistance well enough so that I'm probably not going to find out which one is better. I don't care much for the finger grooves in the First Strike, they tend to get in the way of different grips. That's a highly subjective thing. Both knives are built to take a ton of abuse, which I like. It doesn't get much better than high flat grinds , 1/4 inch stock, and micarta, IMHO.
I would take the FSH for the ergonomics. The steels are both excellent, I think they would both fill the bill steel-wise.
I think that heat treat is everything in any steel and if you check out Cliffs review of 3V you will see differing results depending on the heat treat. I am not saying Fehrman's heat treat is no good, but if a knife comes out with improper heat treat then it could be a problem. Cliff had some issues with the Fehrman knife. However, he had no issues with the Ed Schot 3V blade and I am not sure who heat treated that one, but I'd bet it was Paul Bos.
My latest acquisitions are two 5 inch serious duty 3V custom blades designed by hankins with some minor input by me and made by Hankins which are very nice and can probably last longer than most steels. The 3V was heat treated by Paul Bos so it doesn't get any better than that.
Since the knife is the size of an NO (and actually looks somewhat like an FNO) it could be readily compared. They are flat ground as well. I hve not used them yet. Maybe it's time to compare.
