Byrd-beating and the non-adjustable pivot.

Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
4,091
Disclaimer: No, I'm not noss4, although his voice sounds a lot like mine.

I bought a handful of Byrd knives from Sharp Phil a couple of months ago, one of which was a stainless Cara Cara. I was stringing a course of barbed wire yesterday when I needed to top a 2" locust that was growing up in the fenceline. I didn't have my chain saw in the truck and it would have been a lot of trouble to go through all the gates to get back to the house and pick it up just for one little tree. The only knives I had with me were the stainless Cara Cara and my Benchmade Pinnacle. I also had my 3 lb sledge that I use to drive steel posts. I decided to see what the Byrd would do.

I used the sledge to drive the blade deep into the tree and then pulled it out as straight as I could, circling the tree and taking out chips as I worked in toward the middle. It took about three minutes, but eventually I weakened it enough that I could snap the top off. Hammering didn't seem to hurt the blade at all, but the particular shape of the Cara Cara blade doesn't really lend itself to hammering.

I was very careful to hit the blade squarely and I never applied any force to the handle with the hammer. I hit only the blade and held the handle loosely to minimize the stress on it. Still, in wiggling the blade loose from the cut a few times I severely loosened the blade. You could easily see where the scales had pried away from the blade and the pivot pin was below the surface of the scales on both sides. I took it back to the shop and used a peening hammer to tighten it back up. I tried to peen the ends of the pivot pin to keep the scales from just doing the same thing again the next time there is any lateral stress on the blade, but who knows how well that will work?

Here's my point: in looking at different models of knives you often made decisions about their ruggedness based on factors that don't actually end up mattering. You look at those big solid stainless scales and think how strong they must be, but the friction fit pivot pin makes the scale strength almost irrelevant. Those big beefy scales might take a lot of vertical stress, but it didn't take much lateral stress at all to seriously compromise this knife. Contrast this to a G-10 or FRN version of the same knife which has an adjustable barrel pivot. The 'cheaper' FRN knife would have been a much better choice for this particular task even though FRN is technically 'weaker' than stainless. I doubt it would even have loosened at all, but if it had then a few seconds with a Torx driver would have brought it right back to peak performance. I should have been carrying the Raven instead of the Cara Cara--even though it's a FRN liner lock it would have stood up to this particular task much better.

This little experience has made me look at some of my other knives, especially my stainless Endura and Delica in a new light. I'm feeling a real urge to break out the center punch and flare the ends of the pivot pins on both of them because that seems to be the first point of failure for a knife of this particular construction.

Please understand this isn't a slam on Spyderco or a complaint about the quality of the knife. I freely admit that I was horribly abusing the knife by driving it into a tree with a hammer. I made a conscious decision to do something that I knew I shouldn't be doing to a folding knife. I'm just posting this to elicit some discussion about friction fit pivot pins vs. adjustable barrel pins and to share my experience with the mode of failure the knife experienced. I thought the blade might break, the lock would fail or the pin would shear from the hammer impacts. I never dreamed it would fail laterally just from my wiggling it out of the cut.
 
Hi Elkins,

thanx for the input.

Do you think that we should use the adjustable pivots on the stainless models, keeping in mind they would not be flush with the scales?

sal
 
I've loosened a few pivots that way over the years myself. My very first pocket knife (which I found when I was about seven years old) had been seperated completely. I replaced the damaged pivot pin with, of all things, the axle out of a Matchbox car or some similar toy. Hey, I was seven. I didn't have a lot to choose from. I still have that knife, and it still works just fine forty-five years later.

I thought the screw construction on the Adventura was well done. Since I'm not a fan of stainless handles, my question would be how much expense does that screw construction add to production? Would the added strength and durability offset the added cost to maintain sales?
 
Sal,
I would absolutely love to see some adjustable pivots on some Spyderco SS models. My most beloved Spydercos are SS models including the Delica, Endura, Police, and Lava models. Even though the handles wouldn't be perfectly flat due to the adjustable pivot, I do believe that these knives would take the jump from being near perfect to 100% perfect with that adjustable pivot.
 
Hi Elkins,

thanx for the input.

Do you think that we should use the adjustable pivots on the stainless models, keeping in mind they would not be flush with the scales?

sal

I would have to say yes, based on this particular experience. How much of a redesign would that necessitate in your production workflow?
 
Hi Elkins,

thanx for the input.

Do you think that we should use the adjustable pivots on the stainless models, keeping in mind they would not be flush with the scales?

sal
Sal,

I fully support the idea of adding the adjustable pivots on the stainless models. In fact it’s the only reason I will not buy anymore stainless Byrds. I have purchased over 20 Byrd knives of various shapes and sizes for x-mass / Hanukah gifts back in December. I had to replace most of the stainless Cara’s due to one problem. NO ADJUSTABLE PIVOT. Their was no way to loosen up the blades that were so tight to open even with two hands. 4 or 5 SS Cara’s had this problem. I have them here with me and use them as fixed blades. The protrusion by an adjustable pivot would be minimal and not a hindrance at all. IMO. I love the SS Byrds, but will not buy any without an adjustable pivot. I’m so glad you asked that question. Although it was not to me I know you will appreciate my input.

Love ya Sal.
 
Last edited:
Hi Elkins,

thanx for the input.

Do you think that we should use the adjustable pivots on the stainless models, keeping in mind they would not be flush with the scales?

sal
I would love to see a adjustable pivot on the stainless steel models, when the pivot on my SS cara cara loosens a bit, this is the tool I currently have to use to tighten it, un-tightening it is a real PITA....




hammer-1.jpg
 
While all steel handles are strong, I don't think of this kind of folder as hard use. Mainly because the handles are slippery.
My Dad used his FRN Native for years and it only developed a little lateral blade play. He used it hard. I think there's a place for rivet construction.
Your use of the knife was outside the boundaries of normal use. So should we draw the conclusion that rivet construction is inadequate based on this use?
 
Hi AF,

Rivets have heads that resist slippage. Stainless models are polished flush so the only resistance to pin movement is the pressure of the steel around the pin, no head, not really a rivet.

We have "tricks" that make this stronger, but still not as good as a 'head" of a bolt or rivet in ultimate strength.

Actually it would be quite difficult to provide stainless versions with adjustable pivots without raising costs more than it would seem.

sal
 
Hi AF,

Rivets have heads that resist slippage. Stainless models are polished flush so the only resistance to pin movement is the pressure of the steel around the pin, no head, not really a rivet.

We have "tricks" that make this stronger, but still not as good as a 'head" of a bolt or rivet in ultimate strength.

Actually it would be quite difficult to provide stainless versions with adjustable pivots without raising costs more than it would seem.

sal

So how about actually flaring the heads (rivet, as the poster above suggested) like was done with the older FRN Delicas and Enduras? Would that be cost effective? I suspect it would make a significant difference in the ability of the pin to resist a prying force, but would it cost too much and negatively impact sales?
 
If the holes for the pivot pins were countersunk, it might be possible to flare the ends of the pins to fill the holes and still maintain surface appearence. The problem is keeping from swelling the shaft of the pin into the blade pivot hole at the same time and locking up the blade. I wouldn't want to try it myself, and I would bet that even a change that apparently small would add a significant amount of labor cost to the knife.
 
How about just drilling or reaming them to a taper instead of countersinking? That way you could just peen the outside ends into the cone-shaped hole and maybe have less of a problem with locking the blade.
 
Yeah, I know, but I was thinking like a hobbyist and not a machinist when I said that. When I countersink something I have to swap drill bits and do two separate operations. I leave a hole with a a distinct 'ledge' to accommodate the screw head.

I was thinking about doing a tapered hole in one pass with a tapered drill, thinking it would be cheaper by saving a step. What I didn't think about was that a manufacturing facility could just make their own countersinking bits to do a true countersink in one step.
 
Back
Top