kreole
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 4,183
I got my third Caly 3.5 in today, so now I have one of each. I started comparing them and thinking about when I would carry one model over the other. The CF version is the more classier of the three, so I decided to do a review of that one in how it fills that role, mostly in comparison to the others. Because classy/gentlemanly is mostly aesthetic, that's what the focus of this is; let me say up front some of these things are incredibly picky, but I wanted to show everything I noticed about it. That's not to imply it's a negative review, as I wouldn't have three if I didn't like them, and the CF one has the best f&f of the three. Also, since I only have one of each, I don't claim any of the things I notice are common between the types.
Ok, enough words
Overview shot of all three
The CF is very slightly thinner than the G10 version
The lamination lines are wavy and not symmetric side to side except at the tip
The clip has a lot of tooling marks. A quick dip in a vibrator/tumbler would make it better. All three had such marks. Again, this is an aesthetic concern only, but it lacks something when compared to the Techno's wire clip, for instance.
The lock bar at the unlocking button sticks up on all three. The CF version is just barely above flush, while the VG10 sits well above and the Super Blue falls in between them
CF
VG10
Super Blue
The finish on the CF is closest to mirror, a bit better than the VG10 version (CF on top in pic)
On one side, there is a gap between the CF slab and metal liner. That doesn't occur on either of the others. (bottom slabs in the pic)
The lanyard tube has a smaller diameter than the CF is drilled. It was blatant when I first got it. I had to look at the others to see if they were the same (in other words they weren't as blatant), and they have this trait, though the difference between sizes isn't as large. It was a little tricky to show this well.
The clip screw on the G10 versions are identical, but they differ from the CF version. On the latter, it sticks up higher, which could make it harder to slide it all the way down on thicker pants, as there's less clearance between screw and wire. I tried swapping the sides of the male and female parts, but it didn't matter.
The finish on the spine of the handle of the CF version is better. You can't make out a gap between the liners and back spring. I wonder if this is because the G10 versions have been carried a lot, and the CF version is brand new. (CF on bottom)
Also in that pic you can see the gap between unlock button and back portion of the spine is smaller and more uniform on the CF version.
With the CF version solely, there is no visible gap on either side of the part of the block bar between Boye detent and blade.
CF (with light source in the background--notice nothing comes through)
VG10
None have a flush lock bar when opened, but the CF is best, followed by Super Blue
Both G10 versions scrape the liner on the tang above the jimping, but the CF does not.
The lower jimping of the Super Blue is slightly flattened towards the edge, the VG10 version's looks like it got smashed into something, and the CF version's is nearly perfect.
VG10
CF
The upper and lower jimping both were smoothed along the edge. This only occurs on the CF version and is a nice addition!
CF
G10
Has anyone else with more than one version noticed anything difference between them?
Ok, enough words

Overview shot of all three

The CF is very slightly thinner than the G10 version

The lamination lines are wavy and not symmetric side to side except at the tip






The clip has a lot of tooling marks. A quick dip in a vibrator/tumbler would make it better. All three had such marks. Again, this is an aesthetic concern only, but it lacks something when compared to the Techno's wire clip, for instance.


The lock bar at the unlocking button sticks up on all three. The CF version is just barely above flush, while the VG10 sits well above and the Super Blue falls in between them

CF

VG10

Super Blue

The finish on the CF is closest to mirror, a bit better than the VG10 version (CF on top in pic)

On one side, there is a gap between the CF slab and metal liner. That doesn't occur on either of the others. (bottom slabs in the pic)

The lanyard tube has a smaller diameter than the CF is drilled. It was blatant when I first got it. I had to look at the others to see if they were the same (in other words they weren't as blatant), and they have this trait, though the difference between sizes isn't as large. It was a little tricky to show this well.


The clip screw on the G10 versions are identical, but they differ from the CF version. On the latter, it sticks up higher, which could make it harder to slide it all the way down on thicker pants, as there's less clearance between screw and wire. I tried swapping the sides of the male and female parts, but it didn't matter.


The finish on the spine of the handle of the CF version is better. You can't make out a gap between the liners and back spring. I wonder if this is because the G10 versions have been carried a lot, and the CF version is brand new. (CF on bottom)

Also in that pic you can see the gap between unlock button and back portion of the spine is smaller and more uniform on the CF version.
With the CF version solely, there is no visible gap on either side of the part of the block bar between Boye detent and blade.
CF (with light source in the background--notice nothing comes through)

VG10

None have a flush lock bar when opened, but the CF is best, followed by Super Blue



Both G10 versions scrape the liner on the tang above the jimping, but the CF does not.



The lower jimping of the Super Blue is slightly flattened towards the edge, the VG10 version's looks like it got smashed into something, and the CF version's is nearly perfect.

VG10

CF

The upper and lower jimping both were smoothed along the edge. This only occurs on the CF version and is a nice addition!
CF

G10

Has anyone else with more than one version noticed anything difference between them?