- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,752
I just got in my Caly3 the other day and my first impression wasn't a good one.
I've had and used my Sage for a while and have had nothing but love for it. I didn't have to disassemble it and clean/lube like I've had to do on a lot of my Kershaws (and Benchmades), so I just assumed that this Caly3 would be the same way.
Upon getting it - it was very gritty to open. Understanding that it was a lock-back model (pinned scales and I assumed that the pivot was probably torqued too tight) I loosened the pivot screw some and it definitely made a difference, but there was still some grit in there.
Also, I noticed a flaw in the finish - its a smaller spot on the front of the tang well inside the scales, so its not enough to turn me off of the knife or anything, but I've never experienced a flaw with any of Spyderco's knives - even the value line.
The carbon fiber scales are very smooth, which I knew from reviews, but its definitely noticeable over the Sage - which is in my opinion much nicer (grippier, prettier, doesn't show scratches, etc. as badly).
I then noticed that after opening and closing the Caly, that it was scratching the tang from being up against the liners - so I ended up taking the blade out and found that there are no bushings on this knife - I don't know if that's how its designed, but its the first Spyderco I've ever found with no bushings in it.
Anywho, I cleaned it up (lots of metallic grit in there), and put some Lucas Assembly Lube in there. This stuff is now in almost every knife I own - its a super-tacky, doesn't break down with heat, lasts for a long time, glass-like lube that really seems to make a serious difference in the operation of a folder.
Knife is much smoother and the scratches aren't terrible on the tang once I cleaned them up, but the scratches go across both the steel identifyers/Spyderco label and the Japan label, so it was a bit unsightly (I don't mind scratches on the scales/blade as this is going to be a user, but when they look like they're there from a design issue, I kind of wonder about it). It will definitely be a user, but the bushing-less design kind of stumps me. Are all lock-back Spydercos bushing-less by design?
This thing is razor sharp - even for a Spyderco. The blade edge is polished, but has a few "toothy" spots on it, but I don't know if that's just a thing with ZDP-189 or not - I know this will cut paper so much easier than even my Sage - which would slide through even the thinnest paper with little effort.
Here's some comparison pics. I'm clearly no photographer but I tried using different lighting to see the difference in the scales - oh and the finish on the blades is so friggin perfect that they show every fingerprint even if I cleaned them repeatedly:
I've had and used my Sage for a while and have had nothing but love for it. I didn't have to disassemble it and clean/lube like I've had to do on a lot of my Kershaws (and Benchmades), so I just assumed that this Caly3 would be the same way.
Upon getting it - it was very gritty to open. Understanding that it was a lock-back model (pinned scales and I assumed that the pivot was probably torqued too tight) I loosened the pivot screw some and it definitely made a difference, but there was still some grit in there.
Also, I noticed a flaw in the finish - its a smaller spot on the front of the tang well inside the scales, so its not enough to turn me off of the knife or anything, but I've never experienced a flaw with any of Spyderco's knives - even the value line.
The carbon fiber scales are very smooth, which I knew from reviews, but its definitely noticeable over the Sage - which is in my opinion much nicer (grippier, prettier, doesn't show scratches, etc. as badly).
I then noticed that after opening and closing the Caly, that it was scratching the tang from being up against the liners - so I ended up taking the blade out and found that there are no bushings on this knife - I don't know if that's how its designed, but its the first Spyderco I've ever found with no bushings in it.
Anywho, I cleaned it up (lots of metallic grit in there), and put some Lucas Assembly Lube in there. This stuff is now in almost every knife I own - its a super-tacky, doesn't break down with heat, lasts for a long time, glass-like lube that really seems to make a serious difference in the operation of a folder.
Knife is much smoother and the scratches aren't terrible on the tang once I cleaned them up, but the scratches go across both the steel identifyers/Spyderco label and the Japan label, so it was a bit unsightly (I don't mind scratches on the scales/blade as this is going to be a user, but when they look like they're there from a design issue, I kind of wonder about it). It will definitely be a user, but the bushing-less design kind of stumps me. Are all lock-back Spydercos bushing-less by design?
This thing is razor sharp - even for a Spyderco. The blade edge is polished, but has a few "toothy" spots on it, but I don't know if that's just a thing with ZDP-189 or not - I know this will cut paper so much easier than even my Sage - which would slide through even the thinnest paper with little effort.
Here's some comparison pics. I'm clearly no photographer but I tried using different lighting to see the difference in the scales - oh and the finish on the blades is so friggin perfect that they show every fingerprint even if I cleaned them repeatedly:
Last edited: