DirtDawg
Gold Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2022
- Messages
- 616
Ref: Camillus manufactured Buck 303 Cadets shown - NFS
Having searched threads and forums until my eyes crossed, I've not been able to get my question answered.
Having contacted Buck Knives with my question, and being referred over to bladeforums for an answer, I decided to just jump in and ask. Since I've been unable to learn anything from the Buck 300 History forum regarding my questions, I decided to ask here.
Both knives shown appear to be of Camillus manufacture.
Both knives shown are of nearly identical construction - blade placement, number of springs, brass liner quantities and construction, etc, etc.
The differences I've noted are as follows:
- #2 closed length is .025" shorter than #1
- #2 is also .025" thinner (over scales) than #1
- #2 is noticeably lighter in weight than #1 (when picking up both knives without paying attention to which is which)
- #2 long-pull is .150" shorter in length than #1
- #2 long pull is also positioned farther from the tang than #1 pull
- #2 swedge is not nearly as significant as on #1
I'm just curious as to why this might be. Is anyone able and/or willing to shed light on my inquiry?
The long pull and swedge differences are what really have me wondering.




Having searched threads and forums until my eyes crossed, I've not been able to get my question answered.
Having contacted Buck Knives with my question, and being referred over to bladeforums for an answer, I decided to just jump in and ask. Since I've been unable to learn anything from the Buck 300 History forum regarding my questions, I decided to ask here.
Both knives shown appear to be of Camillus manufacture.
Both knives shown are of nearly identical construction - blade placement, number of springs, brass liner quantities and construction, etc, etc.
The differences I've noted are as follows:
- #2 closed length is .025" shorter than #1
- #2 is also .025" thinner (over scales) than #1
- #2 is noticeably lighter in weight than #1 (when picking up both knives without paying attention to which is which)
- #2 long-pull is .150" shorter in length than #1
- #2 long pull is also positioned farther from the tang than #1 pull
- #2 swedge is not nearly as significant as on #1
I'm just curious as to why this might be. Is anyone able and/or willing to shed light on my inquiry?
The long pull and swedge differences are what really have me wondering.



