1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

  2. Week 7 drawing for the BladeForums.com 20th Anniversary Year of Giveaways will be livestreamed @ 5pm Eastern, Sunday Feb 17!
    Tune in to our YouTube Channel, http://www.youtube.com/TheRealBladeforums, we'll be drawing winners for BladeForums.com merchandise & the grand prize:
    a Kizer Laconico Gemini, along with BladeForums branded gear!

    Additional prize(s) will be awarded to people in the livestream chat, so watch for your chance to win bonus prize(s)

Camillus Mark 2 USN I picked up from ebay

Discussion in 'Camillus Collector's Forum' started by Revhardheaded, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:30 PM.

  1. Revhardheaded

    Revhardheaded

    22
    Jan 11, 2018
    I had posted this on the Ka-Barr forum but I thought it might be more appropriate over here.

    Here is my Mark 2 next to the knife I'm basing on the Mark 2. You can see on the pommel it is a pinned one.
    [​IMG]

    The guard
    [​IMG]

    And it cleaned up a little
    [​IMG]

    Does anyone know if the Ka-Barr replacement handle parts will work ok on the Camillus?
     
    315 likes this.
  2. zzyzzogeton

    zzyzzogeton Gold Member Gold Member

    Feb 17, 2013
    The leather disks will fit no problem. The issue would be the replacement pommel.

    The original WW2 era pinned pommels were only 1/4" thick and the hole went all the way through.

    Kabar's replacement kit pommel is 3/8" thick and the pin hole is "blind", i.e., only 3/4 of the way through the pommel.

    A solution for that issue would be to file down a little on each side of the pommel pin tang so that he pommel can sit down deeper onto the tang, allowing the pin holes to align. Using a blind pin would work just as well as a through pin. You'd just have to slowly take enough off to let the alignment occur.
     
    Bloefield and Vit_213 like this.
  3. David Nowlin

    David Nowlin Gold Member Gold Member

    911
    Jan 17, 2018
    Its just a shame these fine knives arent full tang or at least what i would call 3/4 tang. Imo they are 1/4 tang and should be beefed up.
    I know full tang would cause the loss of the great leather handle.
     
  4. Revhardheaded

    Revhardheaded

    22
    Jan 11, 2018
    If I read the schematics correctly the tang is 17/32 and the space on either side is 9/32.
     
  5. David Nowlin

    David Nowlin Gold Member Gold Member

    911
    Jan 17, 2018
    I was just guestimating? Lol
     
    Revhardheaded likes this.
  6. Revhardheaded

    Revhardheaded

    22
    Jan 11, 2018
    LOL
    :)
     
  7. eveled

    eveled Gold Member Basic Member Gold Member

    929
    Mar 11, 2016
    Not everyone likes full width tangs. The extra weight takes away from the lively feeling the knives have. They become clunky. Plenty of KaBars out there very few with broken tangs.

    I own 50 plus fixed blades and only a couple with full tangs.
     
    David Nowlin likes this.
  8. David Nowlin

    David Nowlin Gold Member Gold Member

    911
    Jan 17, 2018
    Yes i had thought about the added weight so good point. I displace 230lbs of which a large % is raw muscle(total BS:p)so weight is not an issue.
    And 50 fixed blades,geeezzz! What have i been doing with my time and money....:D
    Just added it up i think I’m good for 15 of which 6 are of high quality. Thats right i have 6 Buck fixed blades. IJS ;)
     
  9. sac troop

    sac troop

    869
    Mar 4, 2009
    Since the knife your making is an approximation of the 1219C2 to begin with, I'm not sure I see why your at all concerned with the 1/4 pommel verses the 3/8 pommel.
     
  10. eveled

    eveled Gold Member Basic Member Gold Member

    929
    Mar 11, 2016
    Some tweaks may be necessary on the pommel. But I’m sure it will work fine. That’s why I recommended it in the first place.
     
    Revhardheaded likes this.

Share This Page