ruel,
Thanks, right back at you.
I'd tend to agree with you regarding ancient trade links between Mesopotamia and Indus Valley civilizations. Your swords similarity to the Egyptian kopsh, kepesh, and Assyrian sapara is a good case.
The Turkish yataghan and the sapara are very similiar in shape, maybe the yataghan is the descendant of the sapara. Those traders sure got around.
The armourer I mentioned is Richard Erwinloomis- the maestro of "funky but functional". His blades do cut well. As to the one so similiar to yours I tested, my feeling is that it would be good for trapping your opponents limbs or weapons, and unhorsing cavalry. One of its unusual features is that it pierces with a cutting motion. Recommended for mayhem.
I haven't talked to any Assyrians !knock-on-wood! but from what I've read, if it was nasty, they liked it.
Finn
Thanks, right back at you.
I'd tend to agree with you regarding ancient trade links between Mesopotamia and Indus Valley civilizations. Your swords similarity to the Egyptian kopsh, kepesh, and Assyrian sapara is a good case.
The Turkish yataghan and the sapara are very similiar in shape, maybe the yataghan is the descendant of the sapara. Those traders sure got around.
The armourer I mentioned is Richard Erwinloomis- the maestro of "funky but functional". His blades do cut well. As to the one so similiar to yours I tested, my feeling is that it would be good for trapping your opponents limbs or weapons, and unhorsing cavalry. One of its unusual features is that it pierces with a cutting motion. Recommended for mayhem.
I haven't talked to any Assyrians !knock-on-wood! but from what I've read, if it was nasty, they liked it.
Finn