That's so wrong it's not even funny

.
My intention wasn't to make you mad. In fact I meant to compliment you on your approach and if everyone took that approach there wouldn't be a problem. If I'm wrong then I appoligize.
I can't speak for the others, but I said that I would critique
only design elements in an open forum - and if I do
that, I look forward to the maker challenging my opinion. And an opinion is all it is, even in that arena. If I say "black" and the maker says "white" and then explains to me
why "white" might be the correct answer, I'll be the first to admit my opinion was based on too little information.
Again my point was if this is how a collector handles his critiques you won't ever have a problem.
I have seen too many "critique" threads with
opinions like
"Gee, that looks like it would be a great user!" or "
Wow, the fit and finish looks superb!" All based on a photograph. I feel that I can comment (critique) only on what I have some expertise in - and on what I know through actual experience. That is the reason I don't get drawn into these threads.
Agree.
For instance, if I were to critique an Ed Fowler knife - never having actually handled one - I would probably post something like "
Man, that is butt-ugly. It looks like it would be very difficult to work with."
I will leave
opinions like
that to you "experts".
(FWIW, I spent over 35 years being questioned
only publicly about my opinion - an
opinion on which my entire livelihood depended. And yes, Kevin, my real name is at the bottom of every post.)