Candiru & Crow Hawke Comparison

After I got my second Candiru (gave the first to a refugee), I saw the TOPS Crow Hawke online, but could not find any sites comparing the two.

I finally broke down and ordered the CH.

What's the same?
The steel is almost identical in terms of hardness and how it takes an edge. Both are small enough to be carried comfortably as neckers or in the pocket. On the belt, both are easily concealed.

What's different?
Sheaths: Candiru = molded plastic with a detachable clip plate. CH = Kydex, no clip (chain and cheap 'biner). The quality of the ESEE sheath is better, but it is larger and heavier; I prefer kydex as it's easy to customize. I put a titanium TAD clip on the CH, and the slimmer profile is preferable for belt carry.

Handle: the CH's textured micarta is grippier, but has some sharp corners and is smaller. The Candiru's is more ergonomic.

Usage: Both perform well in most daily tasks. The CH is easier to hold onto when cutting cardboard, but the Candiru produces less fatigue over time.

Bottom line without more extensive field testing of the TOPS knife: The Candiru feels like a more substantial, higher-quality knife, but at a 40% higher cost, it should. I would definitely choose the Candiru as a backup for camping or in my bugout bag. For daily use, the Crow Hawke's smaller package are preferable, albeit with the addition of a clip.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk