Canon dSLR - A really good toy (pix)

Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
95
I finally got what I wanted for Christmas! I had to get it myself, but still...


Anyway, I got this shiny new Canon Digital Rebel / EOS 300D.

EOS300D.jpg



I'm still getting the hang of it, but here are some pictures I've taken so far.

It's not that tough to get decent shots with this cam. The built-in flash is a POS, though, like all built-in flashes. The included 18-55 zoom lens is a little slow for indoors, but I still managed this shot - with a four second exposure.

booze%7E0.jpg

Thank you, Lord, for the process of fermentation.




I passed through this town on the way back from Christmas break. Nobody was inside during the fire, but the buildings were 112 years old - some of the oldest in the province.

fire3.jpg


fire1w.jpg


fire2.jpg

Kids, don't play with matches!





dooger.jpg

"Put that stupid camera away and feed me."

This was one of my first pictures. In the original 3072x2048 image, you can clearly make out the pattern on his nose, and see individual hairs. It's freakin' eerie.



The image quality is phenomenal anywhere from ISO 100 to 400. At 800 it's a little grainy (just a bit, though), and at 1600 there is some visible noise, but you can still get useful shots. It's still cleaner at ISO 1600 than my Canon A40 was at 400.

To conclude: I like it.
 
You took some really striking pictures there. The exposure looks absolutely perfect. Did you touch these up with software? Looks like you will make good use of your camera...Ed.
 
I applied a little bit of Unsharp Mask to all of them, and the one of the bottles had some color curve adjustment in Photoshop, too, but not much.
 
Duuude--I think you got my Christmas present by mistake :p ;) . Man, I want to get one, but my camera budget just isn't where I want it. The cam is cheap for a DSLR, but it's still a little out of my range and the lenses ain't cheap neither. Great pickup, though.
 
I've been eyeing that camera for a while now. As soon as Nikon comes out with a DSLR for under $1000 I'm in. For now, I'll just keep waiting I guess :)
 
I'm still hoping Nikon comes out with a full-frame DSLR so I can actually use my wide angle lenses as wide angle lenses. The 1.5x cropping factor doesn't help on the wide angle side.
 
Originally posted by slide13
I've been eyeing that camera for a while now. As soon as Nikon comes out with a DSLR for under $1000 I'm in. For now, I'll just keep waiting I guess :)

It's been rumored that Nikon will be releasing the D70 to compete with the Digital Rebel. Not sure what the price will be when it gets released though.
 
Congratulations, Mike, on your new camera. I, too, shoot a Canon digital SLR. (They're great work tools, as well as good toys.) You've got a lot to look forward to. It looks like you are off to a fine start.

--Mike
 
Great shots mate. Looks like you've got a good eye.

What is the shutter lag like on your camera? Most digitals I have played with have that annoying lag between hitting the release and triggering the shutter. I've yet to play with a SLR digital and was wondering if they have the same problem.
 
It's way, way faster than a point & shoot digicam.

There is essentially no shutter lag. I can't tell any difference between this camera and a Nikon D1H for shutter response, so it's pretty much instant. Once it gets focus lock, it fires as soon as you fully press the shutter release. And even with the cheap kit lens, it only takes about a quarter to a half second for the AF to work. Canon's USM (ultrasonic motor) lenses just snap into focus.

In low light, it takes longer. I'm talking about really low light; the picture of the liquor bottles didn't take any longer than a 1/2 second to focus, and they are only lit by dim neon tubes.

Try one out sometime, the AF system is really neat. It has little red LEDs in the viewfinder that blink to indicate which AF sensor it picked, or you can manually choose your focus point from the seven available ones.


Screehopper, I don't think Nikon is going to put a full-frame sensor in a digital camera anytime soon. They want you to buy their 12-24mm f/4 digital-only lens instead. It's only $1000, though.
 
Congrats. I'm seriuosly looking at getting one for myself so that I don't have to travel with my 10D.
 
Originally posted by MikeGram
Screehopper, I don't think Nikon is going to put a full-frame sensor in a digital camera anytime soon. They want you to buy their 12-24mm f/4 digital-only lens instead. It's only $1000, though.

As of now, I'm still squeaking by with the 17-35/2.8 on the wide end. Don't even have the 14 to work with. When I need wide I resort back to film and the 17-35 is all I really need. I was shooting slides not too long ago and what a difference it makes when shooting without the 1.5 cropping factor. The view from the viewfinder was humongous!!!
 
You have good eyes !

BTW, does this camera offer manual focus ? Or only AF ?
 
The Digital Rebel was given high marks by the TechTV guys, and I admit it's high on my want list. Still, that's a chunk of change. OH well, I paid that much for my bike....
 
Originally posted by Screehopper
Don't even have the 14 to work with.
I have the Canon 14mm f/2.8L and it'a still not wide enough on the my 10D. I'll wait for the next 1Ds replacement, which should slot in between it and the 10D, so that I can get the 1:1 CMOS. But in the meantime, when I travel, I rarely shoot wides, so the 17-35 f/2.8L, the 28-70 f/2.8L and my 70-200 f/2.8L set works just fine.
Originally posted by beluga
BTW, does this camera offer manual focus ? Or only AF ?
On the EOS system, the MF/AF functionality is on the lens, not the body. Most of the AF USM lenses have a switch that allows you to switch to MF. All the MF lenses do not have AF capabilities.
 
Well said, Tony. That is an impressive set of glass. I'm looking at getting the 70-200L myself. How do you like yours?

I just have to add that while manual focus is technically possible, it is of little practical application on this camera. The viewfinder is smaller than a 35mm camera's, and it is designed for maximum brightness rather than contrast. You can sorta tell if you've got it right, but it's tough to get that critically sharp focus manually through the viewfinder. You can zoom in 10X on the review image to check.

This shot was done using AF, at max aperture on the kit zoom lens.
aviator2.jpg


Full size crop of the same pic.
watch%20full%20size%20crop.jpg


I don't think I could have done any better than that manually.

By the way, if you spring for a USM lens, you can do simultaneous AF and MF.
 
Back
Top