CATRA Edge Testing Results

CJ Buck

Moderator
Joined
Apr 15, 1999
Messages
898
Here is the information from the engineers at Buck. Bill Keys and Pete Quintanilla (of pcks fame). If these images do not come through here is a web address to visit... following all this is a write up that Bill Keys did on steels and angles.

http://www.buckknives.com/bldfor.html

chart1.gif


chart2.gif


EFFECTS ON EDGE SHARPNESS
STEEL TYPES AND EDGE GEOMETRY

by Bill Keys
Engineering Supervisor
Buck Knives, Inc.

As with many complex issues, there are several different factors that can and do influence the sharpness of a knife blade, such as blade steel, heat treatment and edge geometry. Even the term “sharpness” itself refers to more than a single issue. There is the initial sharpness of the blade, “how well does it cut the first time it is used?”, and secondly “how long does the blade keep its useable edge?”

The graphs shown were created using information obtained from Buck Knives’ CATRA machine. Each line on the graph represents the mean of several tests conducted using the identified steel/condition. The CATRA machine is used under controlled conditions when testing is being performed. The operation of the machine is such that a sharpened steel sample is moved in a slicing motion against paper strips, while a constant load is applied to the stack of paper strips. The machine measures, in millimeters, the depth of cut with each movement. This type of testing eliminates the variable “human factor” of varying pressure, stroke, etc. The paper is even produced to specific standards so as to prevent inconsistencies due to the variation in the papers abrasiveness. The vertical axis of the graph shows the depth of cut for each stroke/cycle while the horizontal axis shows the number of strokes/cycles performed. As a standard, we limit the number cycles/strokes to 60, since at that point, all of the samples tested are considered dull by that time, if not before then.

Graph number one compares the following tests:
420HC stainless steel before edge 2000
420HC stainless steel with edge 2000 (E2K)
ATS-34 stainless steel with edge 2000 (E2K)
BG-42 stainless steel with edge 2000 (E2K)
440C stainless steel with edge geometry just outside of edge 2000

Some of the conclusions that can be readily drawn from the test are as follows:

The ATS-34 w/E2K BG-42 w/E2K and the 420HC w/E2K all began with essentially the same level of initial sharpness. The 420HC without E2K and the 440C started at a point slightly less than the other samples, likely due to the edge geometry.

The 420HC without E2K exhibited a dramatic decline in edge retention very quickly

Through nine cycles, all blades with E2K followed essentially the same slope on the curve.

From 10 cycles through 60 cycles, the 440C and the 420HC w/E2K followed similar curves. The ATS-34 maintained its edge slightly better than the 420HC w/E2K and the 440C. The BG-42 maintained its edge slightly better than the ATS-34.

For all samples, except the 420HC without E2K, the curve flattens substantially at approximately 40 cycles. The 420HC without E2K the curve flattens at 25 cycles.

The edge geometry on the 420HC steel significantly altered the performance of the steel.

Graph number two compares the following tests:
420HC with E2K
ATS-34 without E2K- included angle of 40 degrees
BG-42 without E2K- included angle of 40 degrees

Conclusions that can be drawn as a result of graph number two are as follows:

The 420HC w/E2K began with an initial sharpness greater than either the ATS-34 or the BG-42.

The curves of the 420HC, ATS-34 and the BG-42 do not intersect until approximately 27-30 cycles. The curve becomes essentially flat at approximately 40 cycles.

The geometry of edge has a substantial impact on the initial sharpness as well as the longevity of the edge. Optimum edge geometry on good cutlery steel will outperform a common edge geometry on premium steel.

The edge angle of 40 degrees (included) is within the range of edge geometry commonly found on many knives, both high end and low end.

When various grades of blade steel are discussed and compared, it is easy to misidentify steel types. For example, 420 stainless steel is similar to 420HC stainless steel, but it is not the same material. 420 stainless steel is a martensitic stainless steel that can be heat treated to a range of Rc 53-57 max. Its carbon content can be as high as .38 percent, but only need be above .15 percent to meet the industry specifications. 420HC is also a martensitic stainless but with a minimum carbon content significantly greater (.43 percent) than standard 420. Buck’s 420HC generally ranges between .44 and .46 percent. This allows Buck to harden 420HC blades to a range of Rc 58-60 for their standard production products. Of note, there is no AISI designation of 420HC. This is a designation created by some of our steel suppliers to denote 420 stainless steel with a specific level of carbon that is well above the industry standard for 420. ATS-34 is generally hardened to a range of Rc 59-61 to achieve best results, while BG-42 often falls into the range of Rc 60-62.

Buck undertook their edge testing in an effort to provide to the market place products that are top quality in the targeted market segments. There is no question that a blade produced from ATS-34 with E2K will perform at a higher level than a blade produced from 420HC with E2K. There is also no question that a blade produced from 420HC with E2K will perform very well. That is why we use 420HC, with E2K, for many standard production models that the general consumer will purchase, and ATS-34 with E2K for markets, such as Tactical, that require a premium steel.


------------------
CJ Buck
Buck Knives, Inc.
AKTI Member #PR00003


 
Thanks for the post CJ. The forthright response and data provided in response to recent inquiries and questions is one of the reasons that Buck Knives is held in such high regard by customers. I own several Buck knives including 2 with BG-42 blades that really perform well. Performance of the other products I own is certainly reasonable given the price points. In dealing with Buck a few key words always spring to my mind - value of the product and integrity of the company.
 
Thanks CJ. Very interesting post. Interesting test too. If you could lend an ear again, I'd like to add something for for further discussion. Since most of us regular folk dont happen to have a hard leather wheel handy, wouldnt it be more "real life" if you did the E2K angle but left off the final finishing? Or do you feel that that step is not a factor in retention? Thanks again for all your time. Alex
 
Thank you very much,Mr Buck.This is what many have asked for and more.It answers all comers and gives quantifiable proof of the quality of Buck knives, the intregrity of the company and the wise management decisions that have kept Buck a strong company.
Now how many of these fine user Buck knives can I send in for E2K at once.
biggrin.gif

God Bless
Butch Rasmussen

------------------
"We cannot discover new oceans unless we have the courage to lose sight of the shore"
 
Alex,

The tests were performed using blades that were edged and finished in our normal fashion - the only control we maintained is that the edge angles were all consistently 30 degrees. The blade finish is important, since unfinished blades will have hollowgrinds that vary in roughness average, which will affect the outcome of the test. It's really not a factor in edge retention, but the "CAT" will know the difference. Particularly in ATS-34 and BG24 steels which build up a thick oxide layer during heat treatment.

The hard leather wheel that you are referring to is used only to polish the very edge of the blade. After we grind the bevel, we use the leather stropping wheel to create a razor-smooth edge. The final finishing to the sides of the blade is done using a make-up wheel, and then a 3M Scotchbrite wheel.

Pete Q.


------------------
pete quintanilla
Buck Knives, Inc.




[This message has been edited by peteq (edited 04-18-2001).]
 
Kudos to Buck management for forthrightness, a quality lacking by many other manufactures who shall be nameless here.

------------------
Jim Rasmussen
Idyllwild CA
 
Thanks for the reply Pete (boy this is something, corresponding with real celebs). I'm still just a little confused so how about a theoretical question. Say I sharpen a 420HC blade on bench stones at 30 degrees and manage to get it just as sharp as your 420HC with edge 2K. Using your test equipment, which blade will retain its edge longer? Shouldn't the results be the same? Alex
 
Edge 2000 if for real fellas. I sent my son's old Buck knife in for this upgrade and wow! I was amazed...since then I sent 3 more knives in...my goal is for all my Bucks to have E2K!

Thanks to Joe for all the help!

------------------
~Greg Mete~
Kodiak Alaska

Buck Collectors Club-Lifetime Member
JKM-Chai
KnifeKnutt@aol.com
 
Thank you for this great quality info. Do you have CATRA results on the Iofusion blades?

[This message has been edited by mschwoeb (edited 04-19-2001).]
 
Alex,

To answer your question; yes. The CATRA machine works by rapidly wearing the blade sharpness using high force and abrasive test media. Over the course of 60 cut cycles any blade (yes, even a Buck) becomes very dull.

After the first half-dozen cut cycles, the knife is already dulled significantly as you can see from the graphs. At this point, it doesn't really matter how the edge was generated - on a stone or on a machine - edge geometry and blade hardness take over. We believe this is true in real life as well as in the lab.

For overall edge retention and sharpness, the priorities are (1) Geometry and (2) hardness. If you maintain 15 degrees per side, your bench stone will give you excellent performance.

Pete Q.

------------------
pete quintanilla
Buck Knives, Inc.


 
mschwoeb,

Well, we've really stepped in it now!

It's a long story, but IMHO the CATRA machine is not a fully objective test of the Ionfusion concept.

If you visualize the edge of an Ionfusion blade, with one half coated with Titanium-Zirconium Nitride, and the other half is exposed metal - the side with exposed metal will wear faster during cut cycles. In effect, as we are dulling the edge, we are also sharpening the edge by wearing one side. As a result, Ionfusion blades test exceptionally well on the CAT.

Sweet! So Ionfusion sharpens itself as you cut things.... This is a subject of some debate: Personally, I'm sure it's true to a small extent, however since the CATRA machine is so good at compressing a month's worth of knife usage into only a few minutes that effect is overstated.

The way we currently test Ionfusion is to cycle test one pass, then perform a series of measured cutting tasks (such as slicing 1" sections of garden hose), then cycle test one more pass. Over and over until what we have done is dulled the knife using arm strength against common materials, then re-measure the initial sharpness. This is done until a consensus is reached that the knife has become dull enough to require resharpening. At that point, the cutting performance is measured against a standard (E2K) blade.

We have found that Ionfusion has 6-8 times the cutting power of a standard blade at the point when the standard blade is considered to be dull. In other words, this is a subjective measure. But, also it is plain to see that Ionfusion still has sharpness remaining when it reaches a point where a non-coated blade would be dull.

We believe we have positive results with Ionfusion, and we also look at people's posts on the Forums and newsgroups about this product.

Pete Q.

------------------
pete quintanilla
Buck Knives, Inc.


 
More questions for Pete- what is the angle for the iofusion? I know that the E2K is 30 on each side right? Thank you for all this cool info, but it just keeps bring more questions to mind.


[This message has been edited by mschwoeb (edited 04-23-2001).]
 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">It's a long story, but IMHO the CATRA machine is not a fully objective test of the Ionfusion concept.
If you visualize the edge of an Ionfusion blade, with one half coated with Titanium-Zirconium Nitride, and the other half is exposed metal - the side with exposed metal will wear faster during cut cycles. In effect, as we are dulling the edge, we are also sharpening the edge by wearing one side. As a result, Ionfusion blades test exceptionally well on the CAT.</font>

So you are saying you have tests which would make your IonFusion look incredibly good, but didn't want to use the results? That is integrity.

I don't quite follow your testing procedure with the hand cutting, though. You run the IonFusion through one round on the CATRA, then cut some hose, then do it again? Presumably you do the same cycle with a reference blade of another material?

As an engineer, I'd love to see the raw data comparing the Ionfusion to other materials on the CATRA, but I respect your reluctance to post data there. I only have one Ionfusion blade, and can't bring myself to use it much, because it's so pretty (110, checkered cherrywood, champaign blade, brass bolsters).

I do have one coming ordered specifically for Scout activities, which should be here soon (I hope). I'll abuse it over the summer and see what happens
wink.gif


Peace, Al


------------------
Al Folsom alan@folsoms.net
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes.
Then if he gets mad, he'll be a mile away, and barefoot!
* * * *
Buck Collector's Club #1334 (oh man, this is gonna cost me...)
Micah 6:8

[This message has been edited by folsom (edited 04-20-2001).]
 
And are there CATRA results on the damascus blade? And could you just show us what the Iofusion CATRA would look like? I would like to know how deep the first cut is compare to the other materials and such.

[This message has been edited by mschwoeb (edited 04-23-2001).]
 
Hello mschwoeb,

The angle specification for Ionfusion products is the same as for our regular line: 26 to 32 degrees. All on one side, of course.

Pete Q.

------------------
pete quintanilla
Buck Knives, Inc.


 
Hello Al,

Anything for a fellow engineer: Here is the CATRA test procedure for Ionfusion, flowchart style.

CATRA test - one cycle
cut
cut
cut
cut
cut
CATRA test - one cycle
cut
cut
cut
cut
cut
CATRA test - one cycle
cut
cut
cut
cut ...(coffee break)
cut
CATRA test - one cycle
cut
cut
cut
cut .... ad nauseum

The idea is, instead of letting the CATRA machine wear the blade out, AND meaure the rate of wear, we wore the blade down using a manual cutting exercise, and used the CAT only to measure the rate of wear. We did this same procedure with a non-coated blade to compare the results.

I'm glad you are understanding that we can't post our raw test data here. That information came after a great deal of time and dilligence, and quite a bit of expense. We think these are secrets that are best kept to ourselves. Oh, and CJ would shoot me.
wink.gif


Also, I checked with Pete (the little balding guy in the cabin) - your new Gold Ionfusion 110 with Evergreen Camo is in process.

Pete Q.


[This message has been edited by peteq (edited 04-23-2001).]
 
Cool! Thanks. Means it probably won't be here for the Gettysburg camping trip this weekend, but maybe the camporee the weekend after that. We've got 27 new 1st year scouts to impress with a shiney new knife
wink.gif


Thanks for the information. It's interesting to ponder the tradeoff between the objectivity of something like the CATRA machine, versus the more subjective, but "real" actual use.

Peace, Al

------------------
Al Folsom alan@folsoms.net
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes.
Then if he gets mad, he'll be a mile away, and barefoot!
* * * *
Buck Collector's Club #1334 (oh man, this is gonna cost me...)
Micah 6:8
 
In an attempt not to sound so evasive the catra testing for the ion fusion showed initial results of upwards to 200 times edge life. We realized that edge retention is lost through wear and also through flattening by impacting the blade edge in use. The 420hc is only 58 RC and will flatten if impacted. The ion fusion is a theoretical number approaching 80RC and dents or moves with the 420. In just a wear test, we feel those results are real. In the field, we have documented numerous reports of guides skinning and quartering 4-5 elk in a season without a resharpen. One guy whose name escapes me needed a beaver skinner and swore nothing was more destructive to his edge and just raved about the ion fusion knife we sent him.

We decided to stick with the 6-8 times edge life as a claim because it was a more accurate reflection of what a user will encounter.

Ion fusion really delivers the edge retention it promises to do and the development has not stopped. We went from Titanium Nitride to Zirconium Nitride and who knows what is coming next...

My thanks to Pete who handled this thread with great competence.

------------------
CJ Buck
Buck Knives, Inc.
AKTI Member #PR00003


 
Pete,

My questions relate to those asked by mschwoeb.

1. I would like clarification in my own mind as to your answer to his question concerning the included angle on my IonFusion knives. When I look at the three that I own the angle that I see on the one side that is sharpened just seems to my untrained eye to be less than the 26 to 32 degree E2K included angle. I suspect that the answer lies in my "untrained eye".

2. I, too, would like to know a little more about the CATRA IonFusion test that he mentioned - how deep is the IonFusion blade's first cut and how does that first cut compare to the other materials tested.

3. I second his request, if available, for CATRA results on the damascus blades. I have just ordered one from PCKS and would really appreciate the information.

This entire subject and your presentation of the information has been of great interest to me.

This openness and the depth of research that yourself and Buck Knives have provided us on this subject is remarkable and reassures me that collecting Buck knives was a great choice.


------------------
Wray Harrison
Buck Collectors Club
Lifetime Member #1440
Palo Alto, CA
 
Back
Top