I figure it's as simple as this: CRK wouldn't have released a knife to the public that had a design flaw. It would then fail eventually for some...or most and they would be in deep S#$%. I'm sure not only did they test it's integrity thoroughly, but they also implanted it in such a way that just makes soo much sense that they're not worried becausei it's overbuilt just like everything else they make. Really, do you know how risky it would be to take a chance on something like that? They wouldn't be in business if they took those kind of risks with the quality of their products. I can't say it any better than that.
CRK knows as well as any company out there that provides a product or service that it takes years to build a foundation for quality, cutomer service, and general excellence in both service and product in the eyes of the consumer. That reputation, that faith people have in the quality of said company is very hard to get back once screwed up by putting shoddy products/services out there.....no way CRK would make that mistake.
That being said, I think the ceramic ball is cupped in there so the pressure exerted on it is transferred to the sides of the cupped area of the titanium scale where the ball is seated. So the means by which the ball is adhered/attached to the cup aren't stressed. At least that's the way it appears and that's what would make sense. There's no bond out there that you could trust to keep that ceramic ball in there indefinitely in all the knives released in all the theatres of use over the lifetime of the knife which is basically the lifetime of the buyer

so it would have to be mounted in such a manner.