peacefuljeffrey said:
How is it that stickbobby, who evidently wants a return to the days when people could stridently carry, use, and display their knives without having to feel ashamed, is responsible for a reporter being so pathetically ignorant as to the utility of knives?
-Jeffrey
I think what Hair was trying to say is this.
Most of us strive to appear as positive representations of our knife culture. We're like ambassadors of a country, visiting a foreign land.
It is necessary that we present ourselves well, so that non-knuts will see that we are responsible, sane, contributing members of society (sometime more-so than they are). When people display mall-ninja behavior, or fantasize about the best way to harm someone with a knife, they push us all a step backward. That type of behavior promotes the opposite image that we need to portray in order for our tools to be widely accepted. Non-knuts need to see us as people who are just like them, not as dangerous misfits.
This is why many people (myself included) strive to portray our knives as
utilitarian tools, not weapons. Personally, I do not carry a knife as a weapon (or anything else, for that matter).
Some people may not be concerned with what others think (do not misconstrue: I will carry a pocketknife no matter who thinks it's weird), but there are those of us who know that public image
does matter. On a public forum, however, it's best (as far as our
public image is concerned) to refrain from topics that contribute to non-knuts' fear of our tools. Contributing to this fear is what leads to restrictions on our right to carry a knife (as seen in the case of Dusty Baker).
Peace.
Alex.