OK, my new 21" Chitlangi has arrived. As usual, my expectations were exceeded. As promised, here is my comparison with my 21" GS:
First, let's get the hard data out of the way before the touchy-feely stuff. Keep in mind that this particular GS is unusual in weight and blade thickness. I imagine that a more typical GS will be considerably heavier.
21" Gelbu Special, wood handle (KNN): Overall length 21.25", blade 15" long, 1.75" deep, 0.28" thick at widest part of spine. Weight 18 oz, point of balance 3.25 inches from forward edge of bolster. Karda & chakma (horn handles) 5.75".
21" Chitlangi, horn handle (Kesar): Overall length 21.5", blade 15.25" long, 1.88" deep, 0.41" thick at widest part of spine. Weight 28 oz, balance point is also 3.25 inches from forward edge of bolster. Karda & chakma (horn handles with engraving) 6.5" and both have a cho. This Karda would make a perfect caping knife.
Spine edges on both blades are nicely rounded. Blade bend angle on Chitlangi is just slightly more acute than on the GS.
The spine of the GS has a graceful curve from bolster to tip. In contrast, the Chitlangi spine is almost perfectly straight on both sides of the bend.
To me, the GS has the look of a graceful tool that would appear right at home cutting sugar cane. The Chitlangi has a fierce, businesslike appearance, more like a short sword.
The Chitlangi scabbard has a very thick, sharply beveled slab of wood on the outer side, which adds to its warlike demeanor (there I go, personifying a blade).
While the Chitlangi is considerably heavier, it has precisely the same balance point at the GS, and is feels very comfortable to wield.
If I ever get an opportunity to taka a comparison photo of the two, I'll do that and perhaps email it to someone for posting.
Other details on this Chitlangi: the twin fullers are perfect, scrollwork is excellent, and the horn handle is gorgeous.
A question on handles here: if wooden handle afficionados are called Woodchucks, can we call us horn handle fans Horndogs?
