I just have one question, is the Lon Humphrey considered a traditional "style" of knives or are the ones considered traditional like from the late 1800's - the mid 1900's? Like old Kabars or Schrades, etc? I would think that any knife as long it is in the style or pattern of the old knives would be considered traditional, including those made by GEC today. Please give me some of your ideas. Much appreciated.
Questions (and much confusion) can be alleviated by starting here, particularly the 2nd post down:
Guidelines For The Traditional-Folders Fixed Blades Sub-Forum
Yes, old Schrades, KaBars, etc. are appropriate in the Trad forum. But 'traditional' doesn't just mean 'old' - it is also a matter of the style of the knife, and possible also how the knife is made. In the case of most Lon Humphrey knives, since they are hand forged, hammered and built, they would be considered traditional. However, just like Bark River, Lon offers some designs that would probably not fit into the "Traditional" category either. On the other hand, knives with high-tech handle materials, exposed torx screws, blade coatings, etc. are
modern knives, even if they may have been inspired by a traditional design.
Many of us own both traditional and modern knives, and no one is looking down their nose here at one type of knife or the other - it is simply a matter of putting the right info in the right sub-forum, rather than having unrelated topics spread all over BF in places where others might not be able to find them. No one is trying to be an uptight $%&* here either, but when members who have been around a long time try to point this distinction out to a new member, and they are responded to with sarcasm and name calling,
that's where a problem begins. There is simply no need, nor justification for it.
Carry on...