Chris Reeve small Sebenza- Plain or Classic 2000?

Go Large ! ;)

But. . .if ya have to settle on a small. . .it really doesn't matter which one you get ! :D

But. . .if you were danglin' from a shear cliff and my vote meant savin' your life. . .

I'd vote on the Classic. . .just so that you could come back here and tell us what you finally got ! :p
 
Tough choice. I carry the small plain. The small classic will be my next purchase. If there wasn't a small classic, I'd be buying a second plain as a back up to the one I have. I absolutely love this knife.:) Either way, you are getting one of the finest knives available.
If possible, get both.:)

Paul
 
While you're trying to decide (my vote is for the large classic) you need to get a DDR Maxx, it'll give you something to fondle while making your Sebenza decision.
 
Large Classic all the way to the bank and i usally like smaller knifes because of my small hands, but not when it comes to the Sebenza, the Large Classic feels just right in my hand!

James
 
Picture that was posted in this thread is nolonger valid IMO. Newer small regular have almost as pointy tip as small classic has. If I was making decision between smalls and I didn't allready have small reg. I'd buy it.

If I was looking for large I'd buy classic because of clearly pointier tip.
 
Like Buzzbait mentioned, the Classic has a pointier blade. I like that, and find more uses for the pointier blade. I also like the handle shape of the Classic better. If you are going to get your Sebenza from the folks at Reeve, pay them the extra $21 and have them put the swedge on the blade. It makes all the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top