Cold Steel 2011 Voyager

Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
3,986
These knives are pretty much everything I expected them to be, that being a pretty big improvement over the last Voyager series.

This lock is tight. You get no hint of play in any direction when the Tri-Ad lock is engaged, at the same time there is much less spring tension than you get with regular lockbacks, making it easier to disengage. On top of that it also self adjusts for wear. Barring gross abuse I see no reason why this knife won't lockup just as tight a hundred years from now.
The blade has a full flat grind and a good thin edge on the Large (average thickness on the XL). I'm a little disappointed that they didn't do a distal taper as shown in previews last year, but it is still a very good flat grind so I can't complain too much. The blade is made using AUS-8, nothing high tech, but a good long ways from the bottom of the barrel. The thumbstuds do their job without getting in the way, I still prefer a hole, but at least these aren't a hindrance. The Pivot is buttery smooth while exhibiting no play. Top notch there.
The handle is very secure with no noticeable play or flex. I feel much more confident that I'm not going to slip and cut my own hand using one of these compared with the previous generation Voyager. The texture is very aggressive, I'm sure that if I didn't carve off all the points under the clip it would only be a matter of days before I would have no seam left on my pocket. The clip is nice and minimalist, but very tight. As with nearly all pocket clips I had to re-shape it to get the clip onto a double layered pocket seam. I haven't done any heavy cutting yet so I can't say that the knife doesn't give hot spots, though at the least most pocket clips do, so gloves are recommended for extended cutting sessions. If you don't work with your hands a lot the scale texture might rip your skin off anyway.
The handle shape on the XL is definitely made for big hands, and the Large (I still want to call it a medium) feels like it's built for more normal size hands. The grip on the XL encourages my fingers to spread out (should be just right with gloves) where the Large is a more snuggly fit, the finger spacing on the Large is just about perfect for my 3.75" palm (measured at the knuckles).

Considering the $40-$50 price tag I think these things are just about as good as they can be.

OWPLt.jpg


JcTei.jpg




e8feF.jpg


NwQiz.jpg


GoDuB.jpg


zfolI.jpg


IxwqT.jpg


L9gyc.jpg
 
Last edited:
Now to compare them with my current favorites.

LjKsC.jpg


Edge length.
XL Voyager 5.1" ZT0200 4" Volt 3.86" Large Voyager 3.75" Military 3.75" (and the old Voyager X2 was 5.625")
Edge thickness (measured at the corner between the primary and edge bevels, or where that would have been if I didn't grind it off).
XL Voyager .031" ZT0200 .034" Stock Volt .034" (currently .010") Large Voyager .020" Stock Military .024" (currently .010")
Blade thickness.
XL Voyager .150" ZT0200 .157" Volt .157" Large Voyager .137" Military .143"
Stop Pin Thickness.
XL Voyager .175" ZT0200 .156" Volt .150" (with bushing .187") Large Voyager .157" Military .186" (hollow)
Handle length
XL Voyager 7" ZT0200 5.22" Volt 4.87" Large Voyager 5.43" Military 5.5"
Handle thickness (measured at the palm swell)
XL Voyager .66" ZT0200 .73" Volt .536" Large Voyager .64" Military .45"

IckJM.jpg


The Large Voyager compared to the Military.
The blade on the Military is still pretty much as good as it gets, the only downside is that if you plunge the blade into cardboard the hole will bind pretty badly, on most knives you snag on the studs but that shouldn't be so much of an issue with the Voyager. If the blade on the Voyager would have had a distal taper I would have called it next to perfect, but it doesn't so that's still a shiny star going to Spyderco.
When holding the knife horizontally both the Large Voyager and the Military angle the blade down below your fingers to make it easy to cut things on a flat surface, the Voyager actually feels like it works a bit better in this regard. I'm pretty sure you can attribute this kind of thinking to Andrew Demko, working closely with him is the best thing Cold Steel has ever done as far as I can tell.
The lock on the Military is about as good as you will ever need, but the Tri-Ad lock is probably better than you will ever need. I like everything overbuilt so that's something I like about the Voyager, the liner lock/R.I.L (framelock) is still much easier to manipulate though.
At the end of the day I will still take the handle shape of the Military over the Large Voyager, the curves of that knife just feel like home after carrying one on and off for about four years now. I specifically like the long handle on the Military and how it gets wider at the butt end, I like having something for my pinky to grip, almost all other knives shrink away there so it makes the Military stand out. The Voyager makes up for it a bit by being really thick, but that doesn't quite compensate enough for my taste.

rCOil.jpg


nt3f8.jpg


When comparing the Voyager and the ZT0200 the only downside to the ZT0200 is the re-curved blade. I guess if weight savings and the lock are your primary concern then the Voyager would have it beat, I still wouldn't put the super beefy Liner Lock on the 0200 ahead of the Tri-Ad lock for reliability, and especially not for overall strength. Lock performance becomes less important when you have a flipper though. Even if the 0200 fails it would never cut you, your finger is nested deeply in the handle right in the path of the flipper. The blade on the Voyager closes with about half of your finger touching the edge; if, and I do realize this is a pretty unlikely scenario, but if the lock on the Voyager were to fail there's a chance you'd get a good nick out of it.
The build of the ZT0200 is just so solid that it's hard to take the Voyager seriously when comparing them directly, but remembering what knives are made to do you might end up preferring the one that actually does the job better. The grip on the Voyager may not be quite as comfy for my medium large hands, but it is more secure, and the flat spine allows me to choke up on the blade for detail work, where the 0200 is a one shot deal for grip positions (it just happens to get that one shot off perfectly).

AjLGx.jpg


Chz5w.jpg


I would compare the Voyager with the Volt, but the Volt is so close to perfect it just wouldn't be fair, especially after I reground the blade. (Ok I might sometimes prefer the Voyager since the Volt is a little on the slender side for my tastes, but it's pretty much perfect from a technical point of view.)
 
I appreciate the pics - its good to see the size comparo with the XL. I'm already a fan of the large Voyager.

Edit: as much as I like what the XL has to offer, I just can't see carrying something that gigantic. But that probably won't stop me from getting one.
 
Last edited:
I might have to upgrade my gen 1 XL Voyager to the new one.It looks like a winner to me.
 
Thanks for all the work Josh, it's appreciated. I'll be grabbing some of these new Voyagers. :thumbup:
 
Thanks for a well-written review. You do an excellent job of informing knife-buyers of the pros and cons.

I've had my eye on a large Voyager (the only other Cold Steel knife I own is a Peacekeeper I San Mai III), but I'm waffling on it because of all the love/hate I read online about CS and its products. More than almost any other company, it draws both harsh criticisms of its manufacturing processes (of which I am not knowledgable enough to decide who's making the better argument) and its marketing--which I do feel is too full of hyperbole and hurts the company's image among even casual collectors like me.

Have you been able to compare any of CS' blades against blades of the same steel? I'm curious to know from an experienced user if all the hype about the heat treating, etc. has merit. Thanks.
 
Have you been able to compare any of CS' blades against blades of the same steel? I'm curious to know from an experienced user if all the hype about the heat treating, etc. has merit. Thanks.
I'm a fan of Cold Steel so consider me biased. I have quite a few other inexpensive folders with AUS8A blades, and none of them are bad. The RAT1 from Ontatio in particular is another great knife for the money. Having said that, the wide stonewashed blade on the new Voyager is just excellent - regardless of price. AUS8A is soft compared to the more popular newer higher-end steels, but it also touches up real easy.
I think you can't go wrong with the new Voyager (especially for $37!). And I'd tell you if I thought differently. ;)
 
I've already decided that my next knife will more than likely be a Cold steel medium Voyager I just feel like it is to good of a value to pass up.
 
I just picked up a medium a few weeks ago. The last Voyager I picked up was a large but that was in 1997. I abandoned it in 1998 when Spyderco started making their Endura and Delica ambi. It's nice to see the Voyager is finally left hand friendly. I haven't carried it enough yet to have an honest opinion of it as a user, but so far I like it.
 
I recently got the Large (4"). It's all aces, like it better than my old model 4" Voyager, except like many others, I miss the polished blade.

- OS
 
Paradiggum, Voyagers and Enduras were my 90's folders also. I learned how good tip down blade forward carry was for quick deployment by switching them out on the left side so I could practice scenarios where my strong arm was injured - we would teach several local PD's up in NE Ohio. These new 2011 Voyagers are much better all around I think.

I had my Large Voyager apart earlier and took some photos while I had the chance - I'll put the link just in case you guys haven't taken yours apart yet. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/896297-Disassembled-Folders-2011-Voyager
 
Paradiggum, Voyagers and Enduras were my 90's folders also. I learned how good tip down blade forward carry was for quick deployment by switching them out on the left side so I could practice scenarios where my strong arm was injured - we would teach several local PD's up in NE Ohio. These new 2011 Voyagers are much better all around I think.

I had my Large Voyager apart earlier and took some photos while I had the chance - I'll put the link just in case you guys haven't taken yours apart yet. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/896297-Disassembled-Folders-2011-Voyager

I still carry Spyderco but I've found my carry habits have shrunk. My current EDC herd is a Spyderco Delica, Benchmade Mini-Griptilian, Small Sebenza 21 and now the Med Voyager has been added to the family.
I have an old Ex Lg Gunsite that I never could get used to but now a days the Endura and similiar sized knives only seem to ride in the pocket when I'm bumming around the woods. I thought about grabbing a large Voyager for playing in the woods since I now like the smaller version. I live in the middle of nowhere in central Ohio. Plenty of farmland and woods to play. :)
 
Nice review. On a side note, the pic with the 5 vertical knives, which one is that in the center? Very attractive.
 
Special thanx for the pix.

Having carried the Voyager for years I was really looking forward to the addition of the Triad lock, but that Techno angled handle effect is a real deal breaker considering the number of folders of that size I already have in my knife drawers. I would probably go for the new Large G10 Espada before I get a Voyager.
 
Back
Top