DngrRuss1 said:
Then you must feel the same way about any product that would use the same warning for their products. Again, the SUV commercial and the professional driver- closed course- do not attempt. illustration applies.
No it does not because as I noted the last time you brought this up, the same people do not advocate more dangerous activies. Cold Steel does exactly this and thus the arguement is invalid.
I think that your position might hold more water if other manufacturers who do very explicit or extreme advertising like the CS dvd were to give the customer free licence to go nuts.
As noted, every time you bring this up, there are lots of people that when they use performance information to promote their knives will guarantee they will perform to the standards described. Makers have made these comments in the very threads you describe and you choose to ignore them.
If someone were to hurt themselves while testing CS products because LT and CS said that it was perfectly ok- the company would be sued into oblivion.
But it is perfectly fine for Cold Steel to advocate using their Boar Spears to hunt, use their bowies to chop wood, throw the tomahawks around and any other of the dozens of highly dangerous activities that Cold Steel will readily say it is perfectly fine for you to do with thier knives. They of course also promote their knives as self-defence tools. You really want to argue these activities are less dangerous than cutting a piece of hemp rope?
STR said:
.... in the event that one does have to be put to the test you know from watching the video that the lock has a high probability of being as strong as they demonstrated in thier tests, or the blade or whatever other part or whole of the makeup of what you own.
P.T. Barnum would be proud. Someone selling a product says something and thus it has to be true, even when they specifically say right after it that any attempt by the customer to verify the outrageous claims is not only not covered under the warrenty, it compeletly voids said warrenty.
Here is an offer to you a knifemaker :
I have a new forumulation of AO belts, they are designed to offer superior wear resistance and cutting ability. You can lean on them as hard as you want and run them as fast as you want and it doesn't reduce the lifetime. However, any attempt by you to actually verify that the belts to actually perform in this manner will void the warrenty.
How many would you like to order?
It doesn't mean you need to duplicate the tests just to see if they lied does it?
Yes it does because not everyone tells the truth, lots of people are quite willing to vastly overhype their product. Do you really believe that the Cold Steel Trailmaster is as good as Thompson says compared to production and custom bowies. Do you really believe the nonsense they say about AUS-8 being the finest stainless steel in the cutlery industry, about how AISI 420 is a great steel when "sub zero quenched". If you read the various statements by makers/manufactures you will note there is a lot of contradictory information, it obviously can not all be true.
I could site numerous other company warranty quotes from the paper work here in my safe with my new knives from BenchMade, Spyderco, Kershaw, Buck, Gerber, and any other competitors of CS that say almost exactly the same things as those in the Cold Steel warranty.
It is how it is promoted that it relevant. Cold Steel specifically uses the video to sell their knives in direct arguements as to their superior quality as in - this is how great are products are (insert extreme claim of superiority over other brands) you can see this for yourself in our video. Find similar arguements by those other companies and similar refusal to support the performance claims.
-Cliff