Originally posted by The General
I would respect them more if...
1. They used a better steel than 8a most of the time.
2. Dropped the 420 steel series rubbish
3. Dropped the we make the best knives in the world crap...
4. Came back to Bladeforums
5. Stopped claiming 8a beat CPM 440V, ATS-34 et al
6. Offered a Carbon V Tai Pan.
7. Dumped those triple action things, yuck!
8. Made some G10 scales knives!
9. Stopped claiming the Americanised Tanto was the best blade tip
1) I don't mind 8A if Carbon V is offered too.
2) Agreed. There's no excuse for this, at least give us 440a with a good heat treat. It's cheap and works great when SOG does it.
3) If they keep making great hard use knives, they should by all means keep bragging about it, IMHO

4) YES
5) YES
6) If they do, I'll take 10.
7) Thats the next folder on my list, actualy. They are pretty sturdy.
8) Couldn't hurt.
9) Lynn seems to go through phases every year. One year it's tantos, one year it's khuks. One year it's daggers. I like this approach, to a point, cause lynn thomson doesn't seem to make a knife unless he can write an article on why it's the best at something. It kind of prevents boring knives.
My biggest gripe with CS is the 420 thing. Any other steel I could live with. If they want to be cheap, they could use 1095 or something. Proven, reliable, if high maintainance, steel. 420 is the last thing I'd pick.
My biggest "like" is their willingnes to make crazy, specialized things (fighting shovels, boar spears, the torpedo, etc.) Few knife companies have that much guts.