Cold Steel's new steels?

MicroAlign

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
499
I haven't bought a Cold Steel knife in a while and I was considering getting one. However, I have read my share of information on CS and I have mixed feelings towards buying any more of their products. Before I simply stopped paying attention to them, they stopped using AUS 8 for some of their knives in favor of cheaper 400 series steel which was not of as good a quality.

Now, CS has completely changed their blade materials to stuff like VG-1 and SK-5(what the hell is that?). I wrote CS regarding their new blade materials and information on how they compare to steels like S30V, D2, CPM-3V, and M2 and they simply sent me this with nothing else:

"VG-1
When considering a new material for a performance upgrade for the Cold Steel® Tanto, we tested seven different grades of steel including Shiro 2, V-SP-2, 10A, 440C, VG-10, ATS 34, and VG-1. Physical testing for sharpness, edge retention, point strength, shock, and ultimate blade strength showed that while many of the steels had increased performance in one or two testing categories, only one, VG-1, showed the greatest performance increases in the most critical categories. With an outstanding ability to retain an edge and proven strength in point and blade tests, VG-1 will provide Cold Steel® customers with superior performance previously unavailable in a stainless steel blade.

AUS Stainless Steels
The words ³stainless steel² are misleading, because, in fact, all steel will stain or show discoloration if left in adverse conditions for a sufficient time. Steel is made ³stainless² by adding Chromium and reducing its Carbon content during the smelting process. There is a serious performance trade-off with stainless steel. As the Chromium increases and the Carbon decreases, the steel becomes more ³stainless². But, it also becomes more and more difficult to sharpen, and the edge-holding potential is seriously impaired. This is usually why most stainless knives are rarely razor-sharp and quickly lose what little edge they have. In contrast, at Cold Steel® we use AUS 8A Stainless, a high carbon, low chromium steel that has proven itself to be the ultimate compromise between toughness and strength, edge holding, and resistance to corrosion. AUS 6A is a medium to high carbon stainless which is tougher than ATS-34, 440C, ATS-55, etc., but still holds a good edge. This means it is particularly well suited for heavier, longer blades that are subjected to a lot of stress while chopping and hacking.

San Mai III®
San Mai means ³three layers². It¹s the term given to the traditional laminated blades used by the Japanese for swords and daggers. Laminated construction is important because it allows different grades of steel to be combined in a single blade. A simple way to think of this type of construction is to imagine a sandwich: The meat center is hard, high carbon steel and the pieces of bread on either side are the lower-carbon, tough side panels. The edge of the blade should be hard to maximize edge holding ability, but if the entire blade was hard it could be damaged during the rigors of battle. For ultimate toughness the body of the blade must be able to withstand impact and lateral stresses. Toughness is generally associated with ³softness² and ³flexibility² in steel, so that, surprisingly, if a blade is made ³tough² the edge won¹t be hard enough to offer superior edge holding. San Mai III® provides a blade with hard (higher carbon) steel in the middle for a keen, long lasting edge and tougher (lower-carbon) steel along the sides for flexibility.

4116 Krupp Stainless Steel
4116 is a fine grained, stainless steel made by ThyssenKrupp in Germany and is used for hygienic applications (medical devices and the pharmaceutical industry) and food processing which make it a superb material for kitchen cutlery. The balance of carbon and chromium content give it a high degree of corrosion resistance and also impressive physical characteristics of strength and edge holding. Edge retention in actual cutting tests exceeded blades made of the 420 and 440 series of stainless steels. Other alloying elements contribute to grain refinement which increase blade strength and edge toughness and also allow for a finer, sharper edge.

1055 Carbon
1055 steel is right on the border between a medium and a high carbon steel, with a carbon content between 0.50%-0.60% and with manganese between 0.60%-0.90% as the only other component. The carbon content and lean alloy make this a shallow hardening steel with a quenched hardness between Rc 60-64 depending on exact carbon content. These combination of factors make this one of the toughest steels available because, when quenched, it produces a near saturated lathe martensite with no excess carbides, avoiding the brittleness of higher carbon materials. This steel is particularly suited to applications where strength and impact resistance is valued above all other considerations and will produce blades of almost legendary toughness.

SK-5 High Carbon
SK-5 is the Japanese equivalent of American 1080, a high carbon steel with carbon between 0.75%-0.85% and 0.60%-0.90% manganese. As quenched, it has a hardness near Rc 65 and produces a mixture of carbon rich martensite with some small un-dissolved carbides. The excess carbide increases abrasion resistance and allows the steel to achieve an ideal balance of very good blade toughness with superior edge holding ability. Due to these characteristics, this grade of steel has been used traditionally for making a variety of hand tools, including chisels and woodcutting saws, and has stood the test of time and use over many years in many countries.

Carbon V
We have been making knives in the USA out of our exclusive Carbon V steel since 1987. However now due to factors beyond our control we must suspend all shipments of these knives for the foreseeable future and cancel all backorders. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and disappointment this will cause our valued customers but we have no choice. For the past two years we have done all in our power to support the factory making Carbon V knives for us, but they have continued on a downward spiral and are now in a very severe business and financial crisis and have lost almost their entire workforce.

However please don’t despair we will continue to make just about every Carbon V steel knife in either VG-1 San Mai Laminated Stainless steel, 4116 Krupp Stainless Steel or free forged 1050 high Carbon steel. While deliveries may be slow or interrupted on the former Carbon V models we plan to have everything back to normal by January 2007 and we appreciate your continued support as we make this transition to new factories and new steels."


Change is nice and all, but I am curious to know how these steels stack up to steels that come from places like Crucible Steels in which you can compare and contrast to other steels out there. CS doesn't give me any comparisons.

So anyhow, I guess my question is......is Cold Steel going with cheaper materials to cut costs?.......or are they upgrading their materials to give us a better product? Finally, how does CS's VG-1 and VG-1 San Mai stack up to D2 and S30V? My favorite knives come from Benchmade, however CS offers a lot of products that I can't find anywhere else.
 
Sounds like CS has made some reasonable choices IMHO. I wish they'd make the Master Hunter in SK-5, tho'.
 
Their new steels don't compare to S30V or D2 or some of the others you mentioned. But, the bottom line is that they're not looking for the same market that companies like Benchmade are. That doesn't mean there is anything wrong with what they're making. I happen to like a lot of it for the price. I especially like Cold Steel's fixed blades. They are about the best you can do for strength in their price range IMO.
 
i agree "MaxFisher" and if you look on ebay you can get them real cheap
 
...So anyhow, I guess my question is......is Cold Steel going with cheaper materials to cut costs?.......or are they upgrading their materials to give us a better product? Finally, how does CS's VG-1 and VG-1 San Mai stack up to D2 and S30V? My favorite knives come from Benchmade, however CS offers a lot of products that I can't find anywhere else.

I would consider the switch to VG1 from AUS8 an upgrade. VG1 has more carbon than AUS8, so the edge retention should be superior. (BTW you did not ask, but SK5 is a japanese 1085 steel with ruffels and flourishes. Should be good stuff for a chopper knife.)

VG1 should perform on the order of 440C. San Mai III made with VG1 as the center should be an improvement over San Mai III with AUS8 in the center. The VG1 San Mai III should give the edge retension of 440C with the toughness (because of the lamination) of 440A.

However, none of these materials would perform at the level of D2 or S30V for edge retention.

Is it a cost savings? Probably. Is it an upgrade? I think so.

Use the advanced search function using the words "cold steel new" searching this forum for titles only. There are several threads exploring this subject.
 
I bought a four inch clip pointed, plain edged, Voyager, made of VG1 about month ago. I have used it to prepare meals, cutting meat and vegetables, opening letters and anything else I had to cut around the house. Edge retention has been good, and when the edge gets a little dull (IMO) a few swipes on the Super Fine side of my EZE Lap diamond hone and I am back in business. The knife itself is light, opens and closes easily, and the blade is long enough to use around the kitchen. I have been more than satisfied with the performance of the knife and of the VG1 blade.
 
sounds like carbon V blades may have come from camillus
My understanding is that Camillus did produce all of CS Carbon V blades, and did a heck of a job, too, IMHO. as Ethan Becker was once quoted, "The boys at Camillus know their heat treat."
 
I am fixing the edge on my Carbon V tru flight. It's to bad that they have replaced it with either San Mai which is expensive or cheap stuff like the Krupp or 1050. The SK-5 looks interesting but I would much rather give my money to Scrapyard and know I am getting a top notch product.
 
Ok, I've got a question about the new steels. If they don't have Carbon V anymore, why are they launching new knives in 1055 and not remaking the SRK, Recon Tanto, etc. in 1055 rather then AUS8A?
 
I would consider the switch to VG1 from AUS8 an upgrade. VG1 has more carbon than AUS8, so the edge retention should be superior...

Carbon content != edge retention. CARBIDE content, and more importantly distribution, is what gives a steel higher edge retention.

VG-1 has more carbon....whoop-tee-doo. The quesiton is wheater or not those carbon molecules are bonded in the same or better ratio than the AUS-8, and if they are distributed as well or better. Unless someone can give me specs tot he contrary, im extreemly skeptical of any "improvement".

Their high carbon steels like SK5 and "carbon-V" are good.

416 Krupt or whatever, is a bogus low end steel.

VG-1 is a mediocre midgrade stainless.

San Mai III is an EXTREEMLY overpriced mediocre stainless.
 
Has anyone tried a knife with the 4116 Krupp steel yet? I'd be interested in the feedback. I've heard the 4116 Krupp stuff is similar to 440A. Being as I'm a huge fan of Sandvik 12C27 which is also frequently compared to 440A, it don't sound like bad stuff so far...
 
Carbon content != edge retention. CARBIDE content, and more importantly distribution, is what gives a steel higher edge retention.

VG-1 has more carbon....whoop-tee-doo. The quesiton is wheater or not those carbon molecules are bonded in the same or better ratio than the AUS-8, and if they are distributed as well or better. Unless someone can give me specs tot he contrary, im extreemly skeptical of any "improvement".

Their high carbon steels like SK5 and "carbon-V" are good.

416 Krupt or whatever, is a bogus low end steel.

VG-1 is a mediocre midgrade stainless.

San Mai III is an EXTREEMLY overpriced mediocre stainless.

As you say, at this point much of this is supposition based on the available data. Once they are available, I want to get a Voyager in VG1 so I can try the steel as supplied by Cold Steel.

The composition of VG1 looks very much like that of 440C, but with a bit less chrome. My expectation then, is that the performance of VG1 would be about that of 440C. My opinion is that 440C has better edge retension than AUS8. (Call me sentimental, I have no problem with buying a 440C blade. Shucks, it use to be THE stuff to get.) YMMV. Mine might also vary depending on the heat treat of each blade.

As for being a "midgrade stainless", it certainly is no D2 or ATS34. But then, neither is AUS8. We are, in fact, comparing two midgrade stainless steels.

Here is the composition data I used:
http://www.techno.or.kr/en/tscissors_1.htm for VG1

http://www.agrussell.com/knife_information/steel_guide/index.html for AUS8.

I stand by my arguments comparing the VG1 San Mai III to the AUS8 San Mai III. Whether it is worth the extra cost to get that type of stainless performance depends on how well it actually works and the individual buyer. I don't use a lot of big stainless chopping blades, so I will never find out from personal experience. That's why I spend time here. So I can read about the performance of knives I will never have.

But I am looking forward to trying some of the VG1.

Best Regards,
Knarfeng
 
I'm reading that most people think the VG-1 is inferior to Carbon V and that some people look down on the use of the 420 or 440 for the sandwiching material.

My questions/comments are these:

Since the 420 or 440 is used to provide toughness, flexibility and stain resistance as opposed to edge retention (and you don't cut with the 420 or 440) then what's the problem? (You can see my point of view on this but I'm wondering if I'm missing something)

and

Do you think the Trail Master with Carbon V can cut or chop anything that the Trail Master with VG-1 San Mai III can't cut or chop?
 
(1)I'm reading that most people think the VG-1 is inferior to Carbon V and that some people look down on the use of the 420 or 440 for the sandwiching material.

My questions/comments are these:

(2)Since the 420 or 440 is used to provide toughness, flexibility and stain resistance as opposed to edge retention (and you don't cut with the 420 or 440) then what's the problem? (You can see my point of view on this but I'm wondering if I'm missing something)

and

(3)Do you think the Trail Master with Carbon V can cut or chop anything that the Trail Master with VG-1 San Mai III can't cut or chop?



1)
VG1 is not a replacement for Carbon V. VG1 is stainless, Carbon V is not.
VG1 is CS's replacement for AUS8, both as a single stainless steel and in their San Mai.
SK-5 is CS's replacement for Carbon V

2) I think that most people who have an issue with the CS San Mai think that the increase in performance is not woth the cost. San Mai is bloody expensive. I understand what CS is trying to do, and it may work as far as getting a stainless steel that both holds an edge pretty well and is tough. There may be some who for one reason or another need a big stainless chopper and for them, the San Mai performance might be worth the cost. But I don't think most people who need a big chopper need a big stainless chopper. For most people, carbon steel should work fine and be a LOT cheaper.

3) Got no data.
---------------------------------------

I see that CS is going to offer the Trail Master in their new carbon steel, SK-5. SK-5 is in the realm of 1085. It is made by JFE steel in Japan. A 1085 steel ought to be pretty good for a big chopper. Once CS starts shipping the SK-5 versions, someone who has both Carbon V and SK-5 can do a comparison and see how they perform in real life.
 
Given Camillius is gone will any of their knives be made in the US? Large parts of their inventory are already from the Far East.

The only product I've ever bought from CS was a walking stick I used when my leg was broke. Nice stainless head, fiberglass shaft, and never needed sharpening.

It would be hard to top that in a knife, so I quit looking. :D
 
I see that CS is going to offer the Trail Master in their new carbon steel, SK-5... someone who has both Carbon V and SK-5 can do a comparison and see how they perform in real life.

I have a satin CarbonV TM and just as you say, I'm eagerly awaiting a chance to compare it to the new SK-5 model. CS is taking (back)orders for them at $159.99, that's not bad at all if the steel and HT are good.

Would I be crazy to strip that butt-ugly black finish and handle off a first run knife? ;)
 
I'm actaully glad that Cold Steel chose SK-5 as their current replacement for Carbon V. SOG knives has used SK-5 for decades; I believe their original SOG bowies were SK-5. They continue to make their higher-end, traditional Bowies in SK-5. I'm looking forward to this new facet of CS.

As for CS using 420 or 440 as their outer San Mai layers, that steel makes sense; it is stainless, yet decently tough. Fallkniven also uses 420 in their laminated blades.
 
I'm actaully glad that Cold Steel chose SK-5 as their current replacement for Carbon V. SOG knives has used SK-5 for decades; I believe their original SOG bowies were SK-5. They continue to make their higher-end, traditional Bowies in SK-5.

I'm not sure if any of SOG's other fixed blades were SK-5, but the Tigershark was until a few years ago, when it went stainless. An SK-5 T'shark is a hell of a beast - good edge retention, easy sharpening, great toughness.

I'm still on the fence about VG-1. But if the price (and design) is right, I'd feel pretty good about a Cold Steel in SK-5.
 
Back
Top