Just as a point of order "traditional blades" are also combat swords, that is they were designed for combat. In fact they were designed in a time when combat feedback was always a mere battle away. I prefer to think of things like the AK-47 as "tactical" or "modern" designs. Ahem... sorry...
Anyway, to actually answer your question survey says that swords like the AK-47 or Criswell swords work just fine for hacking brush and the like. I don't know if anyone has done test cutting on tatami with one or not.
Even then I don't know if they really compare to traditional blades. Hartsfield or someone made a sort of katana that is a wonder at chopping tatami, but it has a totally different grind style then a tradtional katana. It is a specialized sword for cutting tatami much like a foil or a schlager blade are specialized swords for sport fencing. How would the specialized katana do in actual combat? I don't know it has not and will not ever be in medieval Japanese combat. In a similar manner the comparing the AK-47 or similar to traditional swords is really an apples to oranges comparison.
TYRKON,
Would you tell me about your Busse AK-47? How did it do test cutting? Or anything you'd like to share. I'd like to get a sword and I have it narrowed down to a Katana or the AK. Thanks.
Lycosa
Thanks steelnut. I'm starting to squirrel away money as we speak. Infi just keeps impressing me more and more. Would you attempt to sharpen that blade yourself or would you send it back to Busse? That's a LOPPER!
Lycosa
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.