- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
It's very surprising to me that there's so little competition between custom knife makers.
(by competition, I'm referring to a personal sense of competition among themselves, not so much in that there not being competition in the industry as a whole)
In fact, I've never seen an industry where competing individuals help one another so much even to the point of one training another to perhaps take business away. Quite admirable and unselfish IMO.
This training and especially the sharing of information has progressed the industry by increasing the quality and artistry of custom knives, and perhaps given more new makers the opportunity to become successful makers.
Some may question if this has also hurt the industry in helping to sustain too many new makers, negatively affecting the maker/collector ratio thus the primary and after markets.
We all love the many in progress threads we see on forums that share great detail on very difficult processes/techniques. Some even make it seem that anyone with the means to acquire tools/equipment could become a successful knifemaker.
I believe it would be interesting to hear from makers, potential makers and collectors as to your views and opinions on maker training and the sharing of information? Or if you feel there is in fact competition among makers.
Do makers generally charge for this mentoring/instruction of new makers?
The ABSs primary purpose is for the training of makers of the forged knife. Do we need more such organizations say for stockremoval knives?
New and potential makers; have you considered contacting established makers to get mentoring? Would you expect to or be willing to pay?
As always, thank you in advance for your participation, views and opinions.
(by competition, I'm referring to a personal sense of competition among themselves, not so much in that there not being competition in the industry as a whole)
In fact, I've never seen an industry where competing individuals help one another so much even to the point of one training another to perhaps take business away. Quite admirable and unselfish IMO.
This training and especially the sharing of information has progressed the industry by increasing the quality and artistry of custom knives, and perhaps given more new makers the opportunity to become successful makers.
Some may question if this has also hurt the industry in helping to sustain too many new makers, negatively affecting the maker/collector ratio thus the primary and after markets.
We all love the many in progress threads we see on forums that share great detail on very difficult processes/techniques. Some even make it seem that anyone with the means to acquire tools/equipment could become a successful knifemaker.
I believe it would be interesting to hear from makers, potential makers and collectors as to your views and opinions on maker training and the sharing of information? Or if you feel there is in fact competition among makers.
Do makers generally charge for this mentoring/instruction of new makers?
The ABSs primary purpose is for the training of makers of the forged knife. Do we need more such organizations say for stockremoval knives?
New and potential makers; have you considered contacting established makers to get mentoring? Would you expect to or be willing to pay?
As always, thank you in advance for your participation, views and opinions.
Last edited: