Well I've acquired the idea from katanas. People from japan at that time couldn't all wield large swords, so they made a weapon that relied on speed. European swords at the time depended on brute strength and weight to force their dull blades through objects. After a bit of thinking, I realize the sword we presented here is not a very suitable candidate to try and prove a point. We were trying to make an already light sword even lighter. I also understand that their are many other variables that gives the katana it's reputation as a good cutting tool (such as blade vibration frequencies, material used to make it, shape of tool, etc), but through my research and best of my knowledge, I've been told over and over that the katana was made to be lighter, and sharper, thus relying on speed and it's sharp edge to cut. It was made to suit the people in that area to their abilities. It may not be superior but it gets the job done in a different way and that is what we are trying to do with our design. We may post another thread with a different weapon model. Maybe a much larger sword that is more dependent on it's weight and strength. I would however like to thank you Lorien. Even if I am not right about my theory I very much appreciate your input. It is driving us to produce a better weapon or to learn something new about blades. Cheers.