Cobalt
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 1998
- Messages
- 17,716
Usually higher wear resistance will mean less toughness in a steel. 3V does a pretty good job of balancing both due to the composition as well as the powder process. The fact that it gives near stainless levels of corrosion resistance all in the same package is amazing. Or was amazing compared to knife steels 10 years ago. It's true there are some other really well balanced knife steels available now so maybe 3V seems less amazing than it did.
Cobalt, I have seen Cruwear run at rc 64-65. It has some similarities to a HSS and can do well at rc 64-64.5 not losing as much toughness as 3V comparatively speaking. I like 4V too and I figured I am going to have all 3 steels instead of having to choose just one. My ultra thin Cruwear Phil Wilson at Rc 64.5 does rope and cardboard like much higher alloyed steels yet retains better edge stability than the steels that pull ahead of it in that kind of work like the 20CV/M390, Elmax, etc.
My Vandis 4E ( 4V sister) fixed at rc 59 is like a wear resistant pry bar and my Big Chris fixed 4V at rc 63.5 is an all around performer with great wear resistance yet a bit less corrosion resistance than the rc 59 Vandis 4E blade. Different heat treats in the same steels produce different levels on the steels attributes of course.
All of them ( 3V, Cruwear, 4V, V 4E) are great performing steels that can be tailored to different purposes. If forced to any of them could make me a " one knife for the rest of my life" if that tragedy actually was forced on me.![]()
There again so could a few other steels.
Joe
For me, if a maker is using a tough steel, then take it to the highest Rc that it remains tougher than comparable std steels. Otherwise, what's the point. I am not going to chop or baton a tree with it. I am going to cut and cut and cut. If I ever get to the point where I have to use a folder for things that a fixed blade is more suited to, I have much, much bigger problems.