- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 737
Mine had the same when I first got it. I cleaned the blade with rubbing alcohol and it went away. I would try this before anything else as it can't hurt the blade.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I don't wax the internals. I only use it on the blade to
1) polish the steel very, very mildly
2) wax and seal the cleaned, and dried blades before storing them for a few weeks. Longer with periodic inspections.
When I buy a knife I always treat it with tuff glide and similar products which help the steel resist rust to an extent. I insure not to get acidic or corrosive stuff in areas I can't clean them out of too, which helps. Nothing is perfect and everything takes work, and follow up.
The amount of Chrome in the composition isn't what determines how stainless a particular steel is. It's the "free chrome" that isn't locked up in carbides etc. Carbon content, and heat treat are two of the things that help determine this. This is also one of the reasons that the same batch of steel cut into two matching pieces can have different levels of corrosion resistance, toughness, wear resistance, etc. The heat treat info gives you recommendations for max wear resistance, etc and recommends temps and times, and tempers. Check out some Data sheets. http://www.nsm-ny.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&page_id=35
Thanks for the good info. I didn't know there was such a thing as "free chrome". All the data sheets for stainless steel do not reference this, they do show a chromium content over 10.5% though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless_steel
Skywalker,
Awesome explanation indeed. But I question the Cruwear/M4 comparison. I have a GB and a Cruwear Military and carry them just about the same in just about the same conditions, most notably skiing (hey, you never know). One day skiing with the Cruwear in my waistband, and not a spot on it. One day with the M4 and it's covered in freckles. There may be more to it than steel, like maybe the finish, but so far in my experience the Cruwear is more stain resistant than the M4. Not that either should be in the first place, maybe I sweat more on the GB, but I do remember wiping sweat from the Military too...
Iunno. Just my thoughts. I don't know what to do with my days off anymore.
GatorFlash,
If you look at the link you posted, under Properties -> Oxidation, note that stainless steel's corrosion resistance comes from a passivation layer of chromium oxide that forms on the surface in the presence of oxygen. However, chromium can also be bound up in chromium carbides. If enough chromium is forming carbides with the carbon instead of remaining free, it will not be able to form that chromium oxide layer and corrosion resistance will suffer.
As Mastiff points out, the amount of chromium carbides formed depends on carbon content (the other, defining element in carbides), heat treat, and other alloying elements present. For example, compare ZDP-189 and M390. Both are 20% chromium steels, made of the same eight elements. But ZDP-189 is known to rust a bit under the right conditions while M390 is touted as having completely superior corrosion resistance.
This is partially attributable to their other alloying elements' percentages and carbon content. ZDP-189 has 50% more carbon than M390, a bit more than 1% molybdenum, and less than 1% of every other alloying element. So it has more carbon available to form carbides, which will necessarily be mostly with chromium in the absence of significant amounts of other carbide formers (yes, molybdenum and tungsten will form carbides - but there's very little of them present compared to the chromium).
M390 on the other hand, starts off with 33% less carbon than ZDP-198 - and it has 4% vanadium, another very competitive carbide former. The end result is that less of its chromium is tied up in carbides, more of it remains free, and its corrosion resistance is better as a result (I realize I'm assuming that HT has equal effect on carbide formation in my comparison here - just trying to look at one variable at a time).
Graph comparing M390/ZDP-189: http://zknives.com/knives/steels/steelgraph.php?nm=zdp-189,m390&hrn=1&gm=0
If you look at Cruwear and CPM-M4, notice that while CPM-M4 has less chromium and more carbon - it also has significantly more molybdenum, tungsten, and vanadium than Cruwear, leaving more chromium free to form that protective chromium oxide passivation layer.
Graph for CPM-M4/Cruwear: http://zknives.com/knives/steels/steelgraph.php?nm=cpm m4,Cru-Wear&ni=,272&hrn=1&gm=0
(this is my understanding based on my own [admittedly somewhat limited] knowledge of chemistry and discussions with metallurgists and a materials scientist; if anyone has any corrections or comments I'd be glad to hear them.)