I live in a very humid climate (often 75-95% in the summer).
The box is marked EI :thumbup:
What are the differences you have noticed?
I just feel like the overall finish and function is a half step better:
* The HH blade was very close to center but wasn't dead center. This corrected itself since I start carrying it, opening and closing it. It looks dead center now.
* Every EI was absolutley dead center when closed out of the box
* The grinds seem better on the EI's. The grind on the HH is a little wider and one side seems rougher than the other. That is working itself out with some stropping. The HH just seemed toothier.
* The plastic sleeve was shorter in length with the HH than the EI's. Obviously nothing big there
* The detent seems a tad softer on the HH
* As bodankers stated about one of his HH's, the blade on all my EI's, especially on the back spine and around the thumb ramp jimping seems to be dehorned and more of a satin finish than the HH I have. And way more finished than all the Militarys I own.
* The lock up is a little earlier on all my EI's but it's not late on the HH
* The lock takes more effort to disengage on the HH than the EI's
* The action is butter smooth on all four but with rock solid lockup. The action is so smooth on all four Paras that you almost expect blade plade when it locks up but there is none.
As I said, the difference is miniscule and may even just be me. And I am 100% satisfied with the HH. This is just something I noticed. The is such an awesome knife. Right up there with the Military which to me is easily in the top 10 best production folders in history for the overall sum of it's parts. I put the Para on that list too.