The CRKT Ken Onion Eros was astoundingly sharp - certainly for cutting my typical everyday objects - I wondered why the larger Ripple just did not feel as sharp - don't get me wrong the Ripple was not unsharp - it was just not as sharp in comparison with the Ero......
Now they both use the same Japanese Acuto+ steel (according to Ken Onion an enhanced 440C or some other people have said it's like VG-10) -
However I also realize that the geometry of the blades makes a bigger difference than the steel alone
(from post #58 in Review - CRKT Ken Onion Eros)
one can see that the Eros blade cutting edge is one continuous shallow belly or curve -
that just reminded me of another blade that cuts really well using the same principle -
the legendary Japanese katana sword......
At an idle moment I examined the Ripple blade with a 30x illuminated microscope and was actually surprised to find the Ripple blade had a much higher polished edge than the Eros - but I eventually figured that the cutting edge angle of the Ripple just was not as acute as the Eros.
So I set about re-sharpening the Ripple - and since I like the looks of the Ripple and did not want to mar the finish - I taped up the face of the blade and the scales adjacent to the blade exposing only about 1/8" to the edge - then used my EZE-lap fine diamond hone to work s more acute/shallower angle to the bevel -
But taking the opportunity to roll away the discrete corner between the blade face and the bevel - so it becomes a sort of "zero bevel" - without taking anything drastic/much off the actual face of the blade.
This rolling motion puts a convexed bevel on the blade which helps in cutting through things as well as giving better support to the actual cutting edge itself. (see my earlier attempt from almost 6 years ago - Convexed Edge )
I was pretty pleased with the result - the blade does cut distinctly better than before - still not as good as the Eros - but I really do think it is the shallower bevel combined with the continuous cutting curve that makes it for the Eros -
anyway here are some pics of the resultant edge - both sides:
--
Vincent
http://picasaweb.com/UnknownVincent?showall=true
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com
http://unknownvt.multiply.com/photos
Now they both use the same Japanese Acuto+ steel (according to Ken Onion an enhanced 440C or some other people have said it's like VG-10) -
However I also realize that the geometry of the blades makes a bigger difference than the steel alone
(from post #58 in Review - CRKT Ken Onion Eros)

one can see that the Eros blade cutting edge is one continuous shallow belly or curve -
that just reminded me of another blade that cuts really well using the same principle -
the legendary Japanese katana sword......
At an idle moment I examined the Ripple blade with a 30x illuminated microscope and was actually surprised to find the Ripple blade had a much higher polished edge than the Eros - but I eventually figured that the cutting edge angle of the Ripple just was not as acute as the Eros.
So I set about re-sharpening the Ripple - and since I like the looks of the Ripple and did not want to mar the finish - I taped up the face of the blade and the scales adjacent to the blade exposing only about 1/8" to the edge - then used my EZE-lap fine diamond hone to work s more acute/shallower angle to the bevel -
But taking the opportunity to roll away the discrete corner between the blade face and the bevel - so it becomes a sort of "zero bevel" - without taking anything drastic/much off the actual face of the blade.
This rolling motion puts a convexed bevel on the blade which helps in cutting through things as well as giving better support to the actual cutting edge itself. (see my earlier attempt from almost 6 years ago - Convexed Edge )
I was pretty pleased with the result - the blade does cut distinctly better than before - still not as good as the Eros - but I really do think it is the shallower bevel combined with the continuous cutting curve that makes it for the Eros -
anyway here are some pics of the resultant edge - both sides:


--
Vincent
http://picasaweb.com/UnknownVincent?showall=true
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com
http://unknownvt.multiply.com/photos