The BT-70 is $85 at knifeworks and GPknives. Stoked to pick one up. Terzuola is the man and the only other design of his on the table that I dig right now is the Starmate, by most acounts a blunder of a production compared with what it could have been and well overpriced. My opinion, of course.
I'm pretty much with you on Terzuola statement... I could probably aford to buy a "real" Terzuola folder that I like but they are so hard to find or so out of my finacial reach that I rather concentrate on other graals in my list as the Tilt for example.
Just FYI: A-zon got BT-70 for few bucks less right now. Also, if you are into such type of knives, you might be interested of SOG Kiku folders ( they are two sizes, small - 3.5" blade and large with 4.6" blade ) and they are in the same price bracket as the TB-70, or very close.
In regard of CRKT CQ, yes, it could be better. BT-70 is made in Taiwan if I'm not mistaking but the Chinese made models are just hit or miss, IMO.
I also agree that the steel choise could be personal preference... A "tactical" design really doesn't need fancy steels, it'll be just fine with AUS8 or simmilar stuff. I like to drag with me a second folder, designed with weapon im mind. Some times I use it in just normal edc tasks, I strip wires, cut ties and plastic, carboard and so on and I would like to see some of those produced with better steel. Example of such knife could be the new Voyager with the new Crpenter's steel or the large Griptilian in 154cm. They have the SD design I like and because the chance to use them in SD situation is very slim, they can be used in some normal edc tasks and do have the better steel for it.
I am very happy with my Heiho, it's a very capable little tool for whatever you want ot use it and seems they did the HT right because I don't have musch of a problem with wear and so on. It's also made and priced well. I wish it had auto lawks but htis is just me...
I own few more CRKTs and even I don't use some of them very often I like them and will probably never sell them but I can understand if someone wants to ged rid of few models that didn't live to it's expectations, I guess this is the case with CRKT for more people and fewer like me were lucky enough to get models which manufacturiung was a hit, rather than miss.
Still, I like CRKT, I find them affordable but as many here I like to see better QC and little bit more understanding about puting together a model for production, what steel will be good for it and what probably - not. Steels should not be picked to justify a few more bucks in the price, or follow a current trend, they should be there for the intended purpose of the knife... I love my Razel as design and I find it
very functional for whatever I do with a knife on a daily bases. I had a chance to handle the Razel Quiet sent me and I had to get one of those. Unfortunately, the steel they used didn't really answer my expectations. It does take nice, sharp edge but wears very quick. I tried diferent angles, grits and so on and it's just soft. It could be my particular knife, could be a bad batch, I don't know and I don't care, I still love the knife and will not get rid of it but I will limit it's use for fewer tasks, which is pity because I could put this design in some serious work...
I guess this is another topic, I'm only mentioning it because I think it applies to some of the CRKT models that I have...
