Shivey,
Thanks for sharing your question. The area of taper in a blade bevel from the ricasso (blade flat) to the area of the cutting edge is the plunge. The radius and taper of the plunge corresponds to the amount of arc found in the grind from its aft point on the ricasso until it turns into the spine of the grind. The greater the flow of the arc in the grind line, the longer and greater the radius is in the plunge.
The numbers for the Mirage state a blade length equal to the useable cutting edge; it does not say the entire visible blade's lower edge is sharpened. The undercut shape of the handle allows the blade to have a cutting edge farther back in regards to relative lengths than designs which have a ricasso area extending in front of a more upright handle face.
I did not want my grind lines hidden under the handle. However, in doing so, the grind/plunge combination could have been moved back to the point that more of the "flat" area you described could have been used as a sharpenable area of the bevels. Brought back far enough, the visible grind line would have been a straight line meeting the handle and the full lower flat of the blade profile back to the radius could be a sharp edge.
My design choice was to maintain visible exposure of the blade grind, have a flowing grind rather than a squared and upright grind in order to correspond better with the overall flow of the design, and allow for as much cutting edge as possible toward the rear. Holding these design parameters and limits, the unedged portion you described was the absolute minimum unused area that would remain given my design constraints. As I said, it could have been back more or eliminated altogether, but the compromise to achieve that went against my choices for the design. However, as pointed out, it is unusual to have a useable cutting length equal to the indicated blade length, and this is what this design combination produced and what is often mentioned about the knife.
That's an involved answer but I hope it helps somewhat in explaining the causes and effects found in the design.
Jim