dogboye
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 1999
- Messages
- 7,141
However, the design of the Sebenza frame lock is inherently stronger than the lock on the EDC. The EDC lock is rather thin and slender and has a much higher potential for buckling and bending than the Sebenza design. How much weaker? I also beg to differ on the all things being equal SS is stronger than Ti. Ti is tougher than many exoctic steels and has only been held back from use for knives because of the expense of the raw material and the higher costs of machining. We could do some calculations but the real test is breaking a few of them to distruction and I'm not about to destroy my EDC or my Sebenza.
I would beg to differ on a few points here. The design of the two is the same: frame lock. A frame lock is a frame lock. There may be manufacturing differences that lead to better execution on the Sebenza (or it could be that it is hand fitted

A thinner/more slender lock is not necessarily more prone to buckling/bending, if the thinness is accompanied by a stronger material. I'm pretty sure that steel is stronger than titanium, if you maintain a constant thickness; but, it will be much heavier. The value of titanium is not in its strength:volume(thickness), but strength:weight. Additionally, titanium does have other advantages, such as corrosion resistance and magnetic properties (or lack). Finally, over the long run, in a given design, it appears that steel tends to have better wear properties than titanium.
What does all my drivel mean? Not a thing. The Sebenza is an awesome knife; wish I had enough money to make a Seb a priority to buy.
