Nathan have you tried the multiple quenches in D2?
I've experimented with prequenching and while I've seen the grain refinement they talk about I haven't noticed changes to the carbides (I'm not sure that I would notice) nor have I noticed improvement in performance as a result of the finer grain. Beyond a certain point I'm not sure that finer grain does a whole lot.
I haven't done seven cycles though.
I have also experimented with prequenching above the recommended temperature ranges and have seen some interesting effects that I don't fully understand that could perhaps be related to carbides, though these tweaks have behaved differently with different makes of D2 and could not be called reliable.
Of some significance I've seen that CPM D2 has not responded well to multiple quenches and higher temps.
an additional thought: In a highly alloyed steel like this, carbide size and distribution is largely dictated by concentration and location of the carbide forming elements which do not move with heat, and are therefore more or less locked in place. With enough heat you can start to dissolve a primary carbide, but it is my understanding that it will always return once it eats more carbon.
You can control the carbon in solution and the grain, but beyond a certain point the primary carbides are set in stone. I'm not sure you're going to be able to refine
those carbides much without changing the manufacturing process.
It is my opinion that the majority of the gains you will see with D2 in cutlery applications will have to do with maximizing homogeneity (nice uniform cubic martensite throughout), minimizing RA and keeping the secondary carbides small and uniform (fast quench and tempering under 500). This is done with uniform grain more than ultrafine grain, and addressing its tendency to stabilize RA. I think some of the benefit of prequenching may have as much to do with austenitizing a matrix with dispersed carbon (reduced soak time) as it does with grain refinement, but I don't know. *shrug*