- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,342
Just got home and... damn not too many more things better than your order sitting there just waiting for you!
So like the title suggests, this ain't really a review, more like some initial jumbled thoughts. Read 'em and weep:
--So small, so light!: Note that I just finished lugging around a large Sebenza today. And I didn't bother with the specs before I ordered because it looked so cool that I didn't really care about the particulars. I just assumed it was a heavy, robust folder based on its rep as a worker bee. So its feathery feel will take some getting used to, as I generally like heavier knives.
--Easy one-handed closing: I'd heard/read from so many people about it not being ideal for one hand and even impossible for some. Nope. Just a quick but firm pinch of the compression lock with my pointer and the blade falls gently and perfectly into closed.
--NO UP/DOWN (or any) PLAY
: Lotsa beefs out there re. the compression lock's inherent up/down blade play. That's hooey and this prooves those particular knives are faulty. Or does it?
--That handle!: Based on pics only, I always thought the blade-to-handle proportions were whacky. Who doesn't, right? But in person it's perfect and beautiful and functional and not at all lopsided.
--Prelude to a Millie
: I actually settled on the Para because I really wanted the Military but simply thought it too beastly for practical use, not to mention too big to be comfortable for my medium-small hands. But as I previously mentioned, now that it's in hand, it seems fairly small. I've been drooling over those pics some of you have posted of the extended Military family hanging out together--BG 42, S90V, D2, S30V, camo, orange, black blade. I think I'll start with the BG 42 as I've been dying to try that steel.
--Still loving my Tenacious: To the uninitiated, if holding the Para in one hand and Tenacious in the other, I bet most would think the Tenacious is superior, with its full skeletonized and visible liners, heavier weight, slightly larger blade side-profile, deeper and more resounding *CLUCK* sound when its lock engages. And alot of knuts poo-poo the 8Cr13MoV (or at least its name
), but I'd put some serious money down on a bet that very few of us will ever push a blade to the point where any appreciable differences are discerned. So, Tenacious, you just ignore those naysayers, hold yer adequate 8Cr13MoV head high and cut hard, you Chinese bargain queen!
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go play with my new knife. Good night.
So like the title suggests, this ain't really a review, more like some initial jumbled thoughts. Read 'em and weep:
--So small, so light!: Note that I just finished lugging around a large Sebenza today. And I didn't bother with the specs before I ordered because it looked so cool that I didn't really care about the particulars. I just assumed it was a heavy, robust folder based on its rep as a worker bee. So its feathery feel will take some getting used to, as I generally like heavier knives.
--Easy one-handed closing: I'd heard/read from so many people about it not being ideal for one hand and even impossible for some. Nope. Just a quick but firm pinch of the compression lock with my pointer and the blade falls gently and perfectly into closed.
--NO UP/DOWN (or any) PLAY
--That handle!: Based on pics only, I always thought the blade-to-handle proportions were whacky. Who doesn't, right? But in person it's perfect and beautiful and functional and not at all lopsided.
--Prelude to a Millie
--Still loving my Tenacious: To the uninitiated, if holding the Para in one hand and Tenacious in the other, I bet most would think the Tenacious is superior, with its full skeletonized and visible liners, heavier weight, slightly larger blade side-profile, deeper and more resounding *CLUCK* sound when its lock engages. And alot of knuts poo-poo the 8Cr13MoV (or at least its name
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go play with my new knife. Good night.
Last edited: