Mo2 wrote "Stop trying to base performance off of hrc. The ganzo junk did bad for 62hrc."
I don't see junk when I look at the ganzo knife tested. I see inexpensive. I argue that it would be more accurate to say that the knives in question are made to a price point. To me junk knives would not be useful for cutting, hard to sharpen and would not last very long. It is unreasonable to say these corporate choices we're in any way erroneous or unintentional. And very little guessing occurs in the production of D2 at this point in history. The video you reference doesn't offer any new information that might change my mind. In fact, as a side note, I would love to hear from someone using those s35vn knives from LAPoliceGear that tested at 51 or 52 I think (59 of 84 reviews gave them five stars-that's near 80% perfect review score for a 40 dollar s35vn knife). Anyhow, back to the D2 comparison, the results were expected. Ontario has been cooking D2 at their level of proficiency for a while now, and up to this moment has always generally outperformed Chinese D2.
I'm looking at the 3 brands listed in the video and see the Chinese D2 numbers close together and underperforming the Taiwanese D2 from Ontario. This testers methods and numerical results are reasonable for a well informed consumer. Although I wish someone would retest, taking off at least a millimeter, maybe two from factory bevels to see if burning from power grinding changes results.
I expect Taiwanese Ontario D2 to outperform Chinese D2 as a current trend that I can rely on for inexpensive knife recommendations. I have bought no D2 from China, nor Taiwan, even though I'm interested as a hobbyist, simply because purchasing priorities and limits point elsewhere, like a sweet KOA CF-Hunter in D2 I just picked up off the exchange.
Now how can I make a recommendation on something I don't own? Well performance here is a complex solution that involves the tools manufacturer (geo-political, cultural, etc), the tool, the user and the job. My hope is to apply wisdom (knowledge and experiences) to make the best recommendation for friends and families. We do have two 440C Ganzo's, really liking the steel, not so much the builds on either, they were less then a 20 for a reason. Good news is losing them is less expensive.
I have previously spent time looking at super steel Steve's tables, but not listening to more then a few minutes. This time I watch all 44 minutes. His Ranges and numbers are reasonable and expected, and I'm glad he has contributed more data to compare with others. For example, the other night I enjoyed watching Pete from Cedric and Aida test two D2's differently processed: regular Rat 1, and PSF27-spray formed, along with CTS-XHP (micro melt) and chromium added . Interesting results.