Damascus=Stronger?

There is some research that shows wootz to be better at edge holding than modern steels, when the modern steels are tempered down to the same hardness as the wootz (HRc 41-42). However, with modern heat treatments, it's a different story.

What research are you referring to, most if not all I have read suggests wootz had a great reputation but no one knows how they made it etc, which makes me think it's rather like a vorpal weapon, aka mythical. I don't doubt the ancients knew how to create great weapons (think how much depended on edged weapons at the time) but wonder was this wootz really all that better than pattern welded/laminated steels, which themselves were usually a technique to get good performance out of problematic/impure raw materials.

Imaginary weapons will beat real weapons only in... the imagination. Are there any actual wootz weapons in any kind of condition anywhere that have been tested to show yes, this was the h-bomb of the day?
 
Imaginary weapons will beat real weapons only in... the imagination. Are there any actual wootz weapons in any kind of condition anywhere that have been tested to show yes, this was the h-bomb of the day?

There are surviving examples, yes.

They have been variously tested over the years and indications are fairly well as Me2 claims. (Of course, actual destruction tests have, to my knowledge, not been performed on these relics for obvious -- if unfortunate -- reasons.) The problems modern metallurgists face in reproducing original damascus steel don't mean it is some mythical or imaginary material (again, examples exist). Rather, it simply means that modern manufactory processes are not yielding identical results in these quests for reproduction. It is speculated, as FortyTwoBlades said on page one, that the original damascus arose from distinctly local conditions -- namely irregularities and trace elements found only in certain ore samples from certain mines -- that are yet to be firmly pinned down and emulated.

Also, from what I've read, damascus and wootz steel are not exactly the same thing. As I understand it, original damascus steel is thought to be a type of wootz steel, though the manufacturing techniques of both remain equally unknown.

It's very interesting stuff, this mystery.

W00t(z)!
 
Last edited:
There are surviving examples, yes.

They have been variously tested over the years and indications are fairly well as Me2 claims. (Of course, actual destruction tests have, to my knowledge, not been performed on these relics for obvious -- if unfortunate -- reasons.) The problems modern metallurgists face in reproducing original damascus steel don't mean it is some mythical or imaginary material (again, examples exist). Rather, it simply means that modern manufactory processes are not yielding identical results in these quests for reproduction. It is speculated, as FortyTwoBlades said on page one, that the original damascus arose from distinctly local conditions -- namely irregularities and trace elements found only in certain ore samples from certain mines -- that are yet to be firmly pinned down and emulated.

Also, from what I've read, damascus and wootz steel are not exactly the same thing. As I understand it, original damascus steel is thought to be a type of wootz steel, though the manufacturing techniques of both remain equally unknown.

It's very interesting stuff, this mystery.

W00t(z)!

It's not really much of a mystery. All it is is carbide banding in a plain steel matrix. That gave wootz swords much higher edge retention than was otherwise available at the time, due to the wear resistance of the carbides. Because of their method of distribution, the steel matrix allowed the blade to remain shock resistant in spite of the carbide content. Also, as the edge wore from use, the regular steel would wear away first, leaving a micro-serration of sorts, which gave the sword a bit of extra perceived "bite." And while the method for creating carbide banding was lost at one point it's no longer a lost art. Literally TONS of antique wootz weapons survive to this day, and even antique ingots of the stuff! These have been chemically/scientifically analyzed and I have yet to see any actual cited research that indicates that nanotubes or any other such buzzword quality was present in them besides carbide banding.
 
Here's a nice overview I found on another forum via a quick Google search.

welcome to the world of wootz (or more appropriately, crucible damascus)..
I'll begin with a small introduction... I've spent alot of time in university studying the material and producing a similar substance for my undergrad thesis. Understanding my background, I will on occasion be quoting or referencing studies or specific accounts. My goal is to participate in the wonderful sharing atmosphere of this forum.... hope you enjoy !


Crucible steel
- it has been around for a longtime and was a facette of several cultures... Persian, Indian, Russian, etc
- therefore refering to the steel as "wootz" implies the Indian version of the material.

what is Crucible Damascus?
- there is no mystery... put in a simple way it is a slow cooled, carburetted steel. It is easy to produce following certain guidelines:
1) the carbon level is inbetween 1-2% for the ingot
2) the correct ingredients are in the mix
3) the period between liquidus and solidus is ample to form a third element network aiding in the formation of dendrites.
4) proper thermal anneal of ingot

Carbon levels
- I find this is one of the important key's to producing wootz
- you must be able to reasonably adjust the carbon content of the charge to 1-2% carbon.
- if you go over the 2% mark of carbon ...it will still produce a decent looking ingot but it will have a brassy appearance.. congrats... you have just made cast iron and will be virtually impossible to forge with out crumbling like a cookie.
- later on I will include a basic chemistry formula that I use to adjust the steel to be within acceptable wootz/carbon parameters.

Ingredients
Ofcourse I assume that you've seen the online study
www.tms.org/pubs/journals...-9809.html
- Look closely at the tables.... the elemental break down will set out parameters for your steels content !
- some ingredients are left at very low levels.... this is important to note !!!
-- but some ingredients have no negative effect on the dendrites formation... ( one example is Cr... one of my favourite damask's comes from a charge of 5160 and cast iron)

Liquidus/solidus
- Why the slow cool?
- Imagine a fully liquid, molten charge with a mix of many ingredients !!
As the temperature starts to decline... some of the elements (due to their nature) decide to solidify first before the bulk of the charge. The initial elements come out of solution and solidify form a network of sorts. If you can imagine a spiderweb of these elements forming in a pot of molten metal.
The web forms with the slow cooling and as the cooling progresses.... the carbides begin to grow on this structure. Similar to the dew on a spiders web in the morning !!
When the charge is fully solid, the network is apparent and you can visually see dendrites on the ingot !!
I have pictures but have to figure out a way of posting them?

How slow is slow cool??
- the range of accounts has been from a couple of minutes to 60 hrs... it all really depends on the characteristics you'd like in the steel.. (such as patterning/waterings !!)
-personally, I have cooled it many ways but now I usually just yank the charge out and wrap it in Inswool and let air cool !

Thermal Anneal
- very important
- watered steels are very odd in my experience and I would recommend doing things in a similar manner as the ancient smiths.
- damascus has a tendency to be a terrible substance to forge.... (very high rate of failure !!)
- with a thermal anneal it seems to decrease the red short nature of the material and produce a somewhat ductile rim around the ingot ( a decarburized layer)
- The anneal... personally, I place my cleaned ingots (previously made on another day) in the furnace after a day of melting and leave them in this oxidizing atmosphere overnight.. ( the shell of my furnace is significant and the ingots are usually very hot the next day)
- next day you are looking for a nice even mottling on the whole surface of the ingot (good color !!) or else do it again
- otherwise you could simply stick the ingots in a metal container and fill it with forge scale and stick this in the furnace. (for cool down/anneal)

The method of watered steel making that I'm about to describe is by using a medium carbon scrap steel for the bulk of the charge. The steel I've chosen is 5160 car leaf spring steel which will provide the bulk of material. The main problem now is to adjust the carbon level of the charge to decent damask levels. I will describe two ways that I"ve done this but will lean more on one method...

1) Addition of carbon:
-With this method you basically put your charge of med steel in a clay/graphite crucible
- mixed in with the charge is a measured amount of carbon ( I used aquarium charcoal)
- remember simple chemistry... the carbon is a percent weight of the total charge... therefore it must be adjusted with this in mind
- The charge is now covered with a half a cup to a cup of glass ( I use green wine bottles for this..)
- Finally the charge must be sealed in the A6 graphite crucible ... a) cut a small circle of Inswool (kaowool) fit to the mouth of the crucible
b) fit the circle in the crucible and then plaster the top shut with a 1/4 inch layer of 36 cement or satanite

- now charge is ready to fire
- the lid has never sealed perfectly air tight so there is no real pressure or moisture build up ( cross your fingers)
- the reason for the lid is to prevent the carbon being consumed by the oxidizing atmosphere.. (since carbon has an affinity for oxygen rather than iron)

2) Charge cut with Cast iron

- This is the method that I use partly because it's much simpler and less time consuming. (no fooling with plaster)
-The carbon adjustment in this case is supplied by added a measured amount or cast iron to the base charge ( to raise the carbon level to appropriate levels.... sounds simple!!)
-firstly you must use a cast iron ( around 3 to 5 % carbon)
- it is very important that you know the percent weight of carbon in the cast and the base iron. (or else formulas become even more of a crap shoot)
- get the specification from the place you bought the cast and use this number !!
- more than likely they will give you a range (high and low) for the carbon level... I just take the average of the two and use this nos for the Carbon level in the cast.
-now use the appropriate weight of cast with the base charge of 5160
- put into crucible and use glass to cover charge (1/2 cup)
- you are ready to fire the charge...

It is good to develop your own formulas but I will walk you through the basic chemistry that I used to create my "5160 Damask " forumula ..

Formulae Development:
- firstly I will tell you the method to my madness in developing this formula the way I did..
- I receive my cast in the form of a 16 lbs ingots which is severe to cut or crack a chunk of it off... (my chop saw is way to small ) therefore I sledgehammer it till I get a several pieces.
- I measure the weight of these cast pieces that i've cracked off and adjust the weight of the 5160, accordingly.... (since 5160 is easily chopped into size by my chop saw)
- This is important that you understand the above !!!.... because now you will see my formulae is to adjust 5160 levels ...

Formulae: "5160 Damask"
-developing ratio??
Cast iron ( 1lbs 2.5 Oz) = .525kg
5160 (3 lbs 4.5 Oz) = 1.491kg

cast iron C level = 4.15%C
5160 C level = .6%C

total C level:
Cast .525kg x .0415 C = .0217kg = 21.7g
5160 1.491kg x .006 C = .0089kg = 8.9g
total= 21.7 g + 8.9 g = 30.6g

therefore .525kg + 1.491kg = 2.016 kg total = 2016g of Fe
30.6 / 2016 = .015

.015 x 100 = 1.5 percent carbon level in the charge..

(now we know the weights of both metals to make a charge of 1.5% carbon )
(Translate this into a usable ratio... ???)

simply done !! .525 / 1.491 = .3521 .... (the magic nos)

Formula to adjust 5160:
(xxxx) of cast iron / .35211 = (xxxx) of 5160

to test the formula.... I've got .525kg of cast broken off and need to know the amount of 5160 to mix in..??

there fore.. .525kg / .35211 = 1.491 kg of 5160 needed for charge to have an end product of 1.5% carbon watered steel.

-The cast used in my charge is sorel because it is a very good quality material and available here....... you can make it with other casts of known levels (of elements) and produce your own formulas easily.

Remember... This Formula is adjusted for Sorel cast iron.... you must adjust this for the cast available to you !!!!

Experience and Advice:

Watered steels are often thought of as an impossible material to create and that the recipes are long lost. It is wrong to believe this..... Breant simply described it as a "carburetted iron" .... and if he could recognize this back then !!

creating the ingots is only a very small step in the making of a usable blade !! Wait until you try to forge this material.. the ingots are very hard (almost like striking the surface of your anvil)... and the steel is unforgiving at the temperature it must be forged at...
- too cold and it will crack !!
-- too hot and wootz juice ..( a juicy appearance to the ingot indicating that some material has liquified and is running out.) Soon after this... your ingot will become easy to forge and then it will crumble like a cookie.

- even when you do everything right.... you must forge the ingot with good technique.... or else wootz has a way of cracking on it's own.. ( almost similar to the delamination that occurs with pattern welding -slippage)

this is why sword length are hard to come by...

I have written on the forge techniques but I believe this to be a whole new discussion....

ps.. remember to follow furnace safety around molten steel
 
The rest by the same author.

-I'll just ramble on abit here..
Steel making is not an impossible idea, it just requires a decent furnace to produce melting temperatures. I remember when I first started to melt steel..!!! wow.. there was so little info on how to melt, that I went about it that hard way... at first I had two (t-rex) type venturi's going at once to melt steel.... HAH !!
- after many tries and this was not the answer.. (it's fine for forging but not up to par on a furnace)
- after MANY tries with new designs and experiments... with a modified burner and a crazy amount of air being pumped in... I saw the light... (literally !!!)
- the inner core of the furnace was a white temp that could only be looked at with welding goggles. BINGO !!
- the core of my problem before was that too much of the burn was occuring outside of the furnace due to lack of air mix inside.!!
- also watch your air speed... what you want is volume of air..!! not hyper fast delivery of it.. (small nozzle...etc)
-- seems to push heat out and alot of the burn

Once you've got the technology down pat !! it is a super comforting thought to know that any time I want some blade steel of my choosing... I can just mix up a batch..
-watered steel are nice to look at and some what rare round these parts..
- also expensive on propane... 30lbs in 45-50min in the furnace..
-look forward to partial melts... if you get your furnace set up wrong or the burn is not as hot... you may end up with a half melted mutant blob of ingot and plates under the glass flux.. sometimes I will dip a long 1/4 rod in the pot to see if all the plates of iron are consumed.... DON'T panic if the 1/4 inch touch rod instantly welds to the 5160 plates... just apply a little upward pressure and the end of the rod will slowly let go of the plates it was stuck to..
- I try not to use the rod because I'm alway worried it will spoil the network in the crucible steel

- the crucible are also a bit expensive... clay graphite is what I use, but be warned not to boil steel in these... it will add carbon to your charge... (you may end up with cast iron ....hahaha such a nice brassy ingot good for nothing..)
- boiling steel is also bad... you'll end up with a solidified ingot and many bubbles inside it...another cake for the wall of shame... haha..

oh ya... after your charge has solidified in the crucible (umm...and cooled off...but i shouldn't have to tell you that).. get out the chisels and start chipping away to get the glass off the cake... hopefully it will slide right out.. (cross fingers)
- but watch it.. bang too hard on the crucible and out comes the bottom... ( a lesson I learned with a 78 dollar silicon carbide crucible that I used once..... still smarts to think about it..)

-inspect the ingot right away... does it show a nice pattern of dendrites.. if it does.... your a proud owner of a damasked cake.. (providing its grey in color and forgable)

The temper of crucible damask is very odd..... of the blade studies I've read... traditionally the edge was just pearlite... (on swords) so in otherwords ...quite soft
-- I've read that the swords were hardened by holding up the blade up to a crack in the wall where a swift wind or breeze was channeled through.....
-- another account has the sword being quenched in hemp oil and then tempered for a whole day in a cow dung fire (smoldering)

Honestly... the matrix in it is good in the soft condition... and it hardens like normal steel if you so choose..


-- might I correct your thinking on the subject of pouring the steel..... this cannot be so..
- the steel must be slowly cooled from liquidus to solidus in the crucible itself ...
- (two fold) pouring would chill too quickly and I think the violence of the pour would homogenize the ingredients also (harmful to the damask outcome)
- But you can have various sizes and shapes for the crucible (as was done in ancient times)
- there are examples of pancake shaped for swords
- egg shaped was also common

I have read that the pattern you see on the ingots is not exactly the same pattern which is on the hammer worked steel. My understanding is that the pattern you see on the ingot is transformed under forging heats and deformation.... The carbon rich dendrites on the ingot become the (carbon) source for the carbide formation in the interdendritic regions (after hammer forging). It's not so much the hammering but the heat cycles that influence this..... the hammering aligns the interdendritic regions into planar sheets..(where carbides nucleate)
- so inother words they shift from one side of the fence to the other...

such a marvelous material.....

- The Standard Damask is basically made with cast (same one I used for the other formulae -of known carb content) mixed with 1010 steel (or as I call it ..crap iron)
- it's usually mild steel 1/4 plate.. with little carbon..

Here is an example:
-- I've started by cracking off a chunk of cast that weighs 1.051kg and now need to add the appropriate amount of crap iron to bring the overall carbon content to 1.4% C.

-using the method before to produce a ratio... simply plug in the 1010 ratio number and add the amount of 1010

1.051kg / .513 ratio = 2.047 kg of 1010 crap iron is needed

Therefore the total weight of the cake is 3.098 kg or 6.829 lbs with a carbon content of 1.4% (if my chemistry is correct)

cakes of this size are substantial to forge by your self .. ( a power hammer or a helper is recommended) unless your as pigheaded as I am..

Generally, I like to keep my carbon content in the 1.5 region because it allows for error... The error I'm talking about is the addition of carbon from the crucible.. Clay Graphite crucibles tend to add carbon to the charge if the steel remains molten for long durations...

Using the 1010 steel as a base metal is doable but remember that alot of it is recycled iron .....so it's alloy content is unknown...
-1010 since is of a low alloy content.....will have a very high melting temperature.... so it will be the very last to dissolve into a liquid... The Cast iron will be consumed at a low temperature compared to the 1010... but don't worry....the glass you used to cover the charge will protect it from oxidation and some contaminants.

Once again.. Be safe and follow safe foundry procedures and do so at your own risk...

its an odd material... because of its alloy content, it is easy to overheat it..

the pattern can disappear if the forge heat gets too hot...sometimes it can be thermally cycled to bring it back...(but i've never done it..)

the forge temp is usually between a red and brite orange.... and this is done in a dark shop...
-if the steel goes into the yellow heat... you risk some of it, crumbling..
- work wootz too cold... and you also risk getting cracks..

I will try to work on a forging tutorial for wootz.....
personally, it was an area that i struggled with but i think it was worth the while....
 
The Angel Sword guy was apparently able to get SOME kind of process patented wherein he takes a high shock steel (S7 maybe?) and gets some kind of alloy banding though heat treating. Ed Fowler has done a similar thing with 52100. The difference? Ed Fowler is not an a**hole, so he actually shows you how he does it as opposed trying to sue you for using a term that is at least 1000 years old. LOL
i believe angel sword does a modern version of wootz steel.
 
The Angel Sword guy was apparently able to get SOME kind of process patented wherein he takes a high shock steel (S7 maybe?) and gets some kind of alloy banding though heat treating. Ed Fowler has done a similar thing with 52100. The difference? Ed Fowler is not an a**hole, so he actually shows you how he does it as opposed trying to sue you for using a term that is at least 1000 years old. LOL

Quoted for truth. Or so I hear. :D Seriously, though, Ed is a class act.
 
Another reason for pattern welding steel was to get a piece big enough to make a sword or knife from. Steel was precious and difficult to make, and single pieces large enough for a sword or large knife were rare.

Or, to put it a different way, the technology of the time meant that steel was produced in smaller batches that had an unpredictable carbon content that was also sometimes unevenly distributed in the ingots. Taking several pieces of this un-uniform steel and welding them together and then twisting and folding them helped to distribute the impurities and irregularities more evenly so that any one section of blade would be more uniform and less likely to be either more brittle or more soft than the surrounding material.

In other words, it's a method of averaging steel content.

Once enough steel was averaged in this way the swordsmith could weld strips of hardest steel to the edges of the billet to give the blade a hard edge protected by a tough, uniform spine.
 
The Angel Sword guy was apparently able to get SOME kind of process patented wherein he takes a high shock steel (S7 maybe?) and gets some kind of alloy banding though heat treating. Ed Fowler has done a similar thing with 52100. The difference? Ed Fowler is not an a**hole, so he actually shows you how he does it as opposed trying to sue you for using a term that is at least 1000 years old. LOL

He patented a way (in Apple levels of ambiguity and generality) to do something that every other industry that uses steel for critical components knows about and actively avoids. Then he tried to sue Tim Lively for stumbling upon it himself.
 
Me2: do you have a reference for your comment about Wootz cutting well when compared to other steels at the same Rockwell? That falls right in line with what we have recently learned.

heardheart: Thank you!
 
Or, to put it a different way, the technology of the time meant that steel was produced in smaller batches that had an unpredictable carbon content that was also sometimes unevenly distributed in the ingots. Taking several pieces of this un-uniform steel and welding them together and then twisting and folding them helped to distribute the impurities and irregularities more evenly so that any one section of blade would be more uniform and less likely to be either more brittle or more soft than the surrounding material.

In other words, it's a method of averaging steel content.

Once enough steel was averaged in this way the swordsmith could weld strips of hardest steel to the edges of the billet to give the blade a hard edge protected by a tough, uniform spine.

One way I like to explain it to folks is it's like a homogenization process. Think of it like chocolate chip cookie dough. You have the chips, and you have them dough, but you mix them together because you don't want all of your chips in one cookie. :p
 
From the discussed academic article comparing the cutting performance of wootz with a sample of a few modern steels:

4. Conclusions
(1) Use of the CATRA machine with their standard board to evaluate
cutting performance of steel blades is best carried out at small
stroke numbers.
(2) These experiments support the view that martensitic stainless
steels optimized for hardness and fine carbide distributions
have slightly superior cutting performance than high carbon
steels.
(3) At a hardness of HRC = 61, 52100 steel has a better cutting performance than 1086 steel and both are generally better than
Damascus steel. However, at HRC levels of 41 obtained with
fine pearlite or quenched and tempered conditions the Damascus steel has slightly superior cutting performance than high
carbon steels.
 
The Angel Sword guy was apparently able to get SOME kind of process patented wherein he takes a high shock steel (S7 maybe?) and gets some kind of alloy banding though heat treating. Ed Fowler has done a similar thing with 52100. The difference? Ed Fowler is not an a**hole, so he actually shows you how he does it as opposed trying to sue you for using a term that is at least 1000 years old. LOL

He patented a way (in Apple levels of ambiguity and generality) to do something that every other industry that uses steel for critical components knows about and actively avoids. Then he tried to sue Tim Lively for stumbling upon it himself.

i only thing a knew about the guy was that i saw his table at a custom knife show about 8 years ago. good to know :thumbup:
 
Lots of good info here. There seem to be several competing scientists/metallurgists/academics that make differing claims about how to reproduce the stuff, but I'm not sure there's any universally-accepted method yet. All very interesting, especially the long quotes from FortyTwoBlades above.
 
Back
Top