- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 13,363
Knives that are considered "old or older" in most cases will considered inferior to the current makers price. Subsequently they should be worth less. Whether this is true or not is not the issue. It is a fact that a large sector of the knife buying public do not like having a date on their knife.
Dating a knives will hurt more often then help your collectors trade or sell their knives in the after market. Speaking as some who lives in that market, seldom will you pay for an older knife what you will pay for a new knife. There are exceptions...but very few.
WWG
IMO, a quality custom knife from a well know reputable maker, made of quality materials, in new condition and made to the maker's current standards is in no way less valuable than a new knife form that same maker. Tim Hancock would be an excellent example as he dates and his older pieces do not suffer. It's more about the indivisual piece rather than the age of a piece.
IMO, the reason older custom knives tend to brings less than new has more to do with collector's mind set that you have to sell for less than they paid new. We see it on the exchange forum everyday. Collectors list nice knives for 20% under new, then proceed to lower them every 12 hours that they remain unsold.
Most on-line dealers that consign and buy from collectors don't discount them. Daniel OMalley sells lots of very nice second hand custom knives everyday at current maker prices or more if it's rare or from a hot maker.
No, it's collectors bringing down the resale price of older knives, not age or date marks.