- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,971
The DEK and FK are very different knives. They may have a somewhat similar size but they handle completely different, carry different and fill different roles IMO even though some uses could overlap.
As stated the handle is where I found the biggest difference, not only in feel but in what I can do well with each. I have carried an EDC2 since I got my first and the DEK is the only knife that has found it's way onto my belt for a daily all purpose carry since. To me is more closely resembles the EDC than the FK.
The FK is a great camp knife and did fairly well when I used it a bit during hunting season although I prefer a smaller knife.
The DEK would be a great knife in a last resort defense tool with the added length and blade design and it is nimble enough for everyday uses without being too large, and has the reliability I've come totrust in from CPK. I wouldn't be afraid to push it in a pinch but I wouldn't reach for it to process wood if I had the choice.
I could see using them for similar tasks at times but for anyone thinking they may be to close to one another (admittedly I wondered myself before I got my DEK) they are VERY different knives.
Both are well worth while for me. If I was not an outdoorsman I might lean towards the DEK ... if I did not carry a fixed blade daily or wanted a harder use knife I might chose an FK model. I find great uses for each.
Just one guys opinion ... for what it's worth. If you're on the fence ... you owe it to yourself to get the DEK in hand for yourself.
Thanks, I appreciate that.