Right now I have two Smith's stones and now want another stone. So far I like mine. Was wondering if it is worth the price difference to get a DMT.
Any thoughts? What do you have? Any brand to avoid?
I'd just avoid the 'no name' brands, for the most part. The better brands will likely maintain tighter tolerances for grit size & uniformity. If just hogging off a bunch of steel for a re-bevel job, that might not be a concern. But, the finer you go in the desired edge finish, it'll make a noticeable difference. DMT is known for their 'monocrystalline' diamond, which means the grit particles aren't clumped together, and are more uniform in size. That translates into more predictable results, especially at very fine grits. I think at least some of the other mainstream manufacturers are coming around to the monocrystalline diamond as well.
I think Smith's, Lansky, DMT and Eze-Lap are all good bets, at least. All of these makers have been doing diamond sharpeners for a good while. If there were any significant quality issues with any one of them, I'd bet we would've heard about it by now.
Edit:
One big advantage I see in DMT's product. DMT actually spec's their products by particle size (in microns), in addition to the 'mesh' specs, which is a big plus. Most other manufacturers spec only by 'grit' or 'mesh', which often varies from one manufacturer to another. The 'mesh' spec only implies particles must fit through a mesh screen (filter) of a fixed size, meaning some particles will be larger or smaller than others. Therefore the particle size is less tightly controlled, and the resulting finish is less predictable. Still other makers just spec their products as 'coarse', 'medium', 'fine', etc., which is left wide-open to interpretation.