Did I kill my steel?

Joined
Aug 5, 2014
Messages
213
Some days ago I forged out an integral bowie from 1 inch 1095 round stock. I spent a lot of time forging the whole blade, probably around 4 hours trying to get everything perfect. Following the forging, I let the blade cool and then took it to the electric oven.

I then normalized the blade in the electric oven in successive steps, then went to do an anneal sequence on it that I've seen Kevin Cashen recommend a lot. I've done it on a handful of other blades with good results. The sequence is hold at 1375 for 45 minutes and then cool to below 900 over a 10 hour period (no more than 50 degrees per hour).

The clincher is, I messed up and started the cycle but didn't see that it was set on "hold". Went to bed, came back to it next morning and saw the oven was still on at 1375. I then manually changed to the next step and ran the 10 hour cool down cycle. The blade must have been sitting at 1375 for 12 hours, and then on top of that it had the cool down cycle, so quite a bit of time, especially when adding in forging time.

After taking it out, wow, lots of scale. I actually measured the scale and it was .8mm thick on each side. Now in heat treat, this thing won't harden properly. I've done 3 attempts at hardening in Houghton's G Edit: I used Houghton's K Fast Quench oil and file cuts in enough to where I'd say it's a dud.

What I'm wondering is, at which point did I cause such a high degree of decarb that the steel won't harden? Did holding the steel for a 12 hours at 1375F (plus ramp down) kill it? Or is it more likely that I killed it in the forge? Just FYI I've used this exact steel a bunch already successfully and the forge is temp controlled so it's not likely it would have been way far above temp. I recall something where Kevin Cashen did a test where he held a steel at austenitizing temp for 5 hours without any detrimental effects to grain size, but perhaps decarb can still be an issue?

Thanks for helping me figure this one out, bummed because it was one of my favorite blades as of recent, but always good to learn something.
 
Last edited:
Is Houghton G fast enough for 1095? I don't think it is.

I don't know how long it takes to "cook out all the carbon" to the point where it won't harden properly. I don't think it happened while you were forging. It's possible it happened sitting at 1375 overnight. But I would try a faster quench before giving up on it.
 
The process you did at 1375 degrees is what is known as a spherodizing anneal. This subcritical temperature forces the carbon to congregate in small spheres which is where the name comes from. It is NOT a full anneal. This puts the steel in the condition of being easily machinable in that those spheres of carbon cut and separate easily with cutting instruments like drill bits, taps and dies. Your steel was ready to harden directly after the normalizing steps that you did. There was no need to do the subcritical annealing process unless you were planning on doing a lot of machining on your knife.
Now that the carbon is in those segregated spheres the steel needs to be brought up to a high temp to dissolve the carbon back into solution in the steel so it can be hardened. One would do this by first bringing it up to about 1,600 degrees and then letting it cool back just until black then you could bring it up to your target temperature for hardening and quench. But you must first dissolve all that spherodized carbon to dissolve it all back into solution. This may be part of your problem. And having sat at that temperature for 12 hours it may really be super annealed and need a good high heat to get all that carbon dissolved.
But I will admit sitting at that high temp for that long did not do it any good.
 
Last edited:
Also, there may be an extreme depth of decarb that you're not filing past. I know that CruForgeV for instance will almost make you think it didn't harden, until an extra few file strokes start to skate instead of cut.

I would definitely look at using a faster quench medium. At least some canola heated to 130f if that's what you can source.
 
Hey guys! Just realized that I said Houghton's G, but I meant to say that I used their Houghton's "K" oil, which is their fast oil that some compare to Park's 50 (Though I've read it's a hair slower than parks). For 1095 it's enough and I've successfully hardened a bunch of blades in it so far already.

Karl, that's a great point. Perhaps it's not hardening because the carbides are locked up in spheroids...good call! I'll do the normalizing sequence again and give it another try.

Hey Salem, yea that was what I thought the issue was so I just went for it and filed in quite deep both times. All in all I probably ended up going into the steel a good 3/16" with the file and still not hard. (Btw, just watched your 2nd episode of FIF yesterday and wow, what a beaut that blade was!)

Just curious...is it reasonable to think that there was such a degree of decarb from these treatments that the steel can't be hardened anymore?

I'll keep y'all updated after I do a normalizing sequence and quench again.
 
Just curious...is it reasonable to think that there was such a degree of decarb from these treatments that the steel can't be hardened anymore?

I'll keep y'all updated after I do a normalizing sequence and quench again.

I think if you normalize and quench again, you'll have the answer to that.
 
I don't think you pulled all the carbon out of it, hell I anealed some D2 and it took much longer then 12hrs and was at a high temp then you where at. Yes I had decarb but not crazy bad, it came right off.
 
Yeah, carbon migrates quite slowly in terms of inches per hour. When making blister steel, bars were heated with carbon for days at a time, to carburize the surface deeply, and then the steel would still have to be sheared and welded up again to distribute the carbon throughout.

Thanks, by the way!
 
Hey everyone thanks for the comments thus far! So I did as Karl suggested and normalized again, once at 1625 just to make sure, cooled to black and then once again at 1600. Quenched in Houghtons K after a 5 minute soak, and then went and tested the edge.

...File still bites in!

And not just biting, we're talking 1/4" into the steel here. After first checking with file, I carefully ground away about another 1/8" of the steel (making sure not to overheat) and then went at it with the file. About 1/4" total into the steel after grinding away and putting a big notch in with file...

And again, ive successfully hardened a bunch of blades with this steel/oil combo so they should be ideally matched.

So it looks like then, I must've fried it? Cooked out the carbon during either forging or annealing?

Here's a pic attached just to show...blade is about 3/16 at spine and .050" at the edge.

Now I feel I need to research forging times vs carbon loss and maybe more about long anneals...if anyone has additional thoughts they're much appreciated!

f0eaef9bbf658d1bd630b5879d179115.jpg
 
Weird, but I don't think the forging killed it. You actually end up will little decarb when forging well I do, becaus the surface is constantly flaking off as scale. I don't know if I have any 1095 but I have 15n20 and 1075. I would be happy to cook it for 12hrs at 1375 and test it. Befor we get all crazy do you by chance have anymore of that 1" 1095 bar left. If so then test it, would suck if it's not 1095 but would explain a lot.
 
Grind away the decarb skin. Also grind back the edge about .05". I bet you hit hard steel.
 
Stacy, did you see the photo he posted? He just dug a file STRAIGHT INTO the edge for 1/4"...

I'm guessing another .05" ain't gonna help him.

I almost posted the same thing.

Do a search for 1 inch round 1095 - it doesn't exist that I know of.
I'm beginning to question the steel.
 
1095 is available in rounds, but uncommon. You can get it TGP, HR or CR.
 
Thinking about it, 1375 is a pretty low temp for extreme decarb to occur. Also, the degree to which you've filed into that edge shows, to me, that decarb is not likely the problem, although at only .050" thick it does seem like given the time frame mentioned, it could have gotten all the way through. It seems unlikely at this point that you'll salvage the blade, have you then tried filing into the spine or cutting it through with a bandsaw? I'd be interested to see whether hardness exists in that piece. If not, is it possible you got some 1" mild round mistaken for the 1" round 1095 you've been successfully using in the past? Can you take a slice from a non-thermally treated end of the same bar, quench and test?
 
Hey guys, good detective work ;) I'm in Thailand as a result of chasing a Swiss girl across the world, and I ended up out here for over 3 years at this point [emoji23][emoji5] The steel that we use is all under the JIS standard and is also available in a different range of sizes and thicknesses that I tend to see in the US. All of our 52100 here, for example, (called SUJ2) is only sold in rounds. 01 as far as I've found is sold in rounds as well as very thick bar (20mm minimum) and needs to be bandsawed to thinner sizes...I've done this for multiple orders I've placed. This steel is also only available in rounds as far as I know but it's the most popular steel for getting Hamon activity in the custom knifemaker scene here. People here call it the 1095 equivalent and make some beautiful knives from it.

Almost all of the steel I've gotten here is Bohler-Uddeholm or Thyssenkrup, except for this one. I've avoided using JIS or DIN or any other specs when posting here because they have listed equivalents and as most people don't tend to know the JIS spec I think it's better to just list the AISI equivalent.

That being said, it seems that my AISI equivalent for this steel may have been off a bit. This steel is JIS SK4 and I was told that it was the JIS equivalent of 1095, but upon checking now, I'm seeing that it may belong more to the W1 family of steels. The heat treatment for the two is super similar however, so I think for the sake of this situation it shouldn't make a big difference. It's a low manganese hypereutectoid steel with the same carbon profile and a tiny bit of chromium and nickel in it. I know that just a pinch of alloying can change a steel, but really, these steels seem to act the same. All of the other knives I've made with this steel and this oil as the quenchant came out super hard, not a chance for a file to touch it (if only I had a Rockwell harness tester)...

FWIW, Here's a screenshot of the steel profile from the Zknives database

812b62500bc804e0c36d2dca92446990.png


In future posts, if it makes more sense, I'm happy to list the JIS specs if it helps to clarify.

Back to the matter at hand regarding the knife and heat treatment, I think it's toast at this point.

JT, I would be VERY interested to see what happens if you cook a piece at 1375 for 12 hours. I'd love to know if that was the culprit, and if there was a difference in hardness (do you have a Rockwell tester by chance? [emoji16])
 
Last edited:
Back
Top