- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
- Messages
- 763
I clarified with customer services. Yes, they offered to collect the knife and check it out...
I will likely have it collected once again now that I have doubts about the actual steel (I had considered the knife a workable tool, and wasn't prepared to send it off for a month just to have the burr put back on). I thought I would be sending it out for more sharpening (something me or another professional would take far more care at, and something CS performed poorly at the first time around), but now I am more in the belief that there is an irrepairable problem.
I am not of the belief that long drawn out customer service interactions deserve the same status as a product that works as advertised out of the box. Customers do not owe companies every opportunity; should I ship my knife around for the next 5 years as long as they offer to collect it?? Nevertheless I gave credit where it was due, and have stated that my post wasn't meant to complain, but to get a better understanding of others' experience and to share my own. The SRK performing poorly initially and then CS doing a poor job reconditioning the blade aren't complaints - they are just facts. I didn't expect you to have to confirm that they offered to collect the knife (I said they did, and commended you for it), but instead hoped someone would look into the practices of the repair department. How will the guy at the sharpening wheel know that my knife is likely flawed (I expressed concerns over the HT in my initial e-mail, why not check the blade the first time)? Will CS be looking over his shoulder to make sure I'm not sending it back a 4th time? Would CS send an improperly heat treated blade back with a new edge, even though the life of the blade is shortened from all the grinding? I don't consider offering to check a product the same as offering to address a problem, or actually fixxing a problem. I feel like there are some deficiencies at CS (forget turnaround or the poor grind, shouldn't the blade have checked initially and everything have been documented?)
Nevertheless, I will arrange collection again, and we can further dissect this one in a few weeks.
I also want to apologize to CNCpro, I don't agree with doubting someone just because they are new, but there is no doubt I could have expressed that disagreement better. I look forward to the resolution too, and hope it's a triumph for CS customer service and can be used as a positive testimonial to the lengths they will go to address a problem.
A. Justice