He got his information from actually cutting stuff...
He said he was testing for high sharpness edge retention, cutting a plastic grocery bag of unknown thickness as a lower benchmark, which can throw all over the place any notion you may have of how these steels "rank"...
Most people with such definite content-based notions think newer steels=better, and more alloys=better, even when the materials cut and the minimum sharpness is not specified... This is why marketing works.
For a more reality based approach, see how a $1 Chinese knife in something like 420 is virtually undistinguishable from CPM M4 or K390, this over a huge amount of cutting correctly randomized material...:
Note at the end the issue of "Cognitive bias" in testing...
Gaston