- Joined
- Mar 25, 2002
- Messages
- 254
Hi Benjamin, here's how I see it.
"How is carrying a knife a question of ethics? It might attract unwanted attention, get in the way of everyday activities such as driving, or clash with your mode of dress ( a large survival knife would look wierd with a business suit, for example,) but how is it unethical?
"
The actual act of carrying "A" knife I'm not referring to, but the decision to carry one type versus another for a specific situation or environment. Busse BM vs. a Spyderco Kiwi for example.
_________________________________________
"The laws are the minimum standard to which we as individuals and a society are held accountable for our behaviour. It doesn't mean we shouldn't hold ourselves to a higher standard."
What do you mean by this? IMO a higher standard would be to keep ourselves prepared. Carrying a gun, for example, is holding yourself to a higher standard than not carrying one. Carrying a first aid kit in your vehicle is a higher standard than not carrying one. It is taking responsibility for protecting yourself and others. Following the Boy Scout motto, "Be Prepared" is holding yourself to a higher standard. Conforming to sheeplism is holding yourself to the lower standards of socialism and collectivism.[/QUOTE]
I guess it would depend on the interpretation of "standard". I agree with a good chunk of your interpretation and context of standard.
However, in Canada it is illegal to carry any weapons. A knife or gun carried with the intent to defend or harm is considered a "weapon" thus not exactly a high "standard" in this sense.
Most of what you mentioned involved in being prepared I agree with safety kits etc. However It doesn't mean you have to carry a sheeple-unfriendly knife or a gun. But that is largely debatable depending on where you live
Have a Happy New Year!
"How is carrying a knife a question of ethics? It might attract unwanted attention, get in the way of everyday activities such as driving, or clash with your mode of dress ( a large survival knife would look wierd with a business suit, for example,) but how is it unethical?

The actual act of carrying "A" knife I'm not referring to, but the decision to carry one type versus another for a specific situation or environment. Busse BM vs. a Spyderco Kiwi for example.
_________________________________________
"The laws are the minimum standard to which we as individuals and a society are held accountable for our behaviour. It doesn't mean we shouldn't hold ourselves to a higher standard."
What do you mean by this? IMO a higher standard would be to keep ourselves prepared. Carrying a gun, for example, is holding yourself to a higher standard than not carrying one. Carrying a first aid kit in your vehicle is a higher standard than not carrying one. It is taking responsibility for protecting yourself and others. Following the Boy Scout motto, "Be Prepared" is holding yourself to a higher standard. Conforming to sheeplism is holding yourself to the lower standards of socialism and collectivism.[/QUOTE]
I guess it would depend on the interpretation of "standard". I agree with a good chunk of your interpretation and context of standard.
However, in Canada it is illegal to carry any weapons. A knife or gun carried with the intent to defend or harm is considered a "weapon" thus not exactly a high "standard" in this sense.
Most of what you mentioned involved in being prepared I agree with safety kits etc. However It doesn't mean you have to carry a sheeple-unfriendly knife or a gun. But that is largely debatable depending on where you live

Have a Happy New Year!